From Discourse Analysis to Argumentation Schemes and Back: Relations and Differences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science - Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems ◽

10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_1 ◽

2013 ◽

pp. 1-17 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Elena Cabrio ◽

Sara Tonelli ◽

Serena Villata

Keyword(s):

Discourse Analysis ◽

Argumentation Schemes

Download Full-text

De-Konstruktion von Glaubwürdigkeit in Online-Debatten

Studia Linguistica ◽

10.19195/0137-1169.35.4 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 ◽

pp. 67-80

Author(s):

Maria Stopfner

Keyword(s):

Discourse Analysis ◽

Qualitative Analysis ◽

Critical Discourse Analysis ◽

Community Of Practice ◽

Identity Construction ◽

Critical Discourse ◽

Right Wing ◽

Argumentation Schemes ◽

Extreme Right ◽

Left And Right

The de-construction of credibility in online-debatesSharing the notion of credibility as a dynamic construct within interaction, the paper traces the argumentative manoeuvers by which left- and right-wing users try to de-construct credibility within online-debates. Based on the concept of “Community of Practice”, the qualitative analysis combines cognitive as well as conversation analytic approaches to identity construction with typical far and extreme right argumentation schemes specified by critical discourse analysis.

Download Full-text

The Language of Argumentation: A Book Review

Journal of language and Education ◽

10.17323/jle.2021.12538 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 274-276

Author(s):

Nico Irawan ◽

Tri Febrianti Valentina

Keyword(s):

Discourse Analysis ◽

International Community ◽

Formal Logic ◽

Classical Rhetoric ◽

Speech Communication ◽

Argumentation Schemes ◽

Different Types ◽

Recent Developments ◽

Argumentative Texts

The Language of Argumentation by Ronny Boogaart, Henrike Jansen, & Maarten van Leeuwen (Eds). Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2021 aims to provide important theoretical insights to the international community of argumentation theorists by informing them of recent developments in the field. Some aspects of argumentative texts may emerge as a result of the argumentation process. This book covers different types of argumentative procedures and enthymematic argumentation, argumentation structures, argumentation schemes, and fallacies. Specifically, contributions are solicited from authors trained in informal or formal logic, modern or classical rhetoric, and discourse analysis or speech communication.

Download Full-text

Plasticity of the neural coding metaphor: An unnoticed rhetoric in scientific discourse

Behavioral and Brain Sciences ◽

10.1017/s0140525x1900133x ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 42 ◽

Author(s):

Giulia Frezza ◽

Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Keyword(s):

Discourse Analysis ◽

Neural Coding ◽

Scientific Discourse ◽

Convincing Argument ◽

Unified View ◽

Brain Behavior

Abstract The convincing argument that Brette makes for the neural coding metaphor as imposing one view of brain behavior can be further explained through discourse analysis. Instead of a unified view, we argue, the coding metaphor's plasticity, versatility, and robustness throughout time explain its success and conventionalization to the point that its rhetoric became overlooked.

Download Full-text