An Automatic Registration Method Based on Fiducial Marker for Image Guided Neurosurgery System

Author(s):  
Minjie Yin ◽  
Xukun Shen ◽  
Yong Hu ◽  
Xiaorui Fang
2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 1012-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Woerdeman ◽  
Peter W. A. Willems ◽  
Herke J. Noordmans ◽  
Cornelis A. F. Tulleken ◽  
Jan Willem Berkelbach van der Sprenkel

Object The aim of this study was to compare three patient-to-image registration methods in frameless stereotaxy in terms of their application accuracy (the accuracy with which the position of a target can be determined intraoperatively). In frameless stereotaxy, imaging information is transposed to the surgical field to show the spatial position of a localizer or surgical instrument. The mathematical relationship between the image volume and the surgical working space is calculated using a rigid body transformation algorithm, based on point-pair matching or surface matching. Methods Fifty patients who were scheduled to undergo a frameless image-guided neurosurgical procedure were included in the study. Prior to surgery, the patients underwent either computerized tomography (CT) scanning or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with widely distributed adhesive fiducial markers on the scalp. An extra fiducial marker was placed on the head as a target, as near as possible to the intracranial lesion. Prior to each surgical procedure, an optical tracking system was used to perform three separate patient-to-image registration procedures, using anatomical landmarks, adhesive markers, or surface matching. Subsequent to each registration, the target registration error (TRE), defined as the Euclidean distance between the image space coordinates and world space coordinates of the target marker, was determined. Independent of target location or imaging modality, mean application accuracy (± standard deviation) was 2.49 ± 1.07 mm when using adhesive markers. Using the other two registration strategies, mean TREs were significantly larger (surface matching, 5.03 ± 2.30 mm; anatomical landmarks, 4.97 ± 2.29 mm; p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions The results of this study show that skin adhesive fiducial marker registration is the most accurate noninvasive registration method. When images from an earlier study are to be used and accuracy may be slightly compromised, anatomical landmarks and surface matching are equally accurate alternatives.


1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.E.L. Grimson ◽  
G.J. Ettinger ◽  
S.J. White ◽  
T. Lozano-Perez ◽  
W.M. Wells ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S459-S460 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Scherman Rydhög ◽  
R. Perrin ◽  
R. Irming Jølck ◽  
T. Lomax ◽  
F. Gagnon-Moisan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 5559-5567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ha Manh Luu ◽  
Wiro Niessen ◽  
Theo van Walsum ◽  
Camiel Klink ◽  
Adriaan Moelker

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-612
Author(s):  
程国华 CHENG Guo-hua ◽  
王阿川 WANG a-chuan ◽  
陈舒畅 CHEN Shu-chang ◽  
赵 宇 ZHAO Yu ◽  
范晓锐 FAN Xiao-rui ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1288-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kengo Ohta ◽  
Masashi Shimohira ◽  
Shigeru Sasaki ◽  
Hiromitsu Iwata ◽  
Hiroko Nishikawa ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P143-P144
Author(s):  
Nozomu Matsumoto ◽  
Jaesung Hong ◽  
Hashizume Makoto ◽  
Shizuo Komune

Objectives 1) Develop a less invasive but accurate enough registration strategy for otological surgical navigation. 2) Evaluate the new system in phantom study. 3) Evaluate the new system in cochlear implant surgeries. Methods A new registration method was developed for otologic surgery. Previously, the registration for accurate image-guided surgery often required invasive fiducial markers attached on patient's bone. We utilized the template of the bone surface to transfer the pre-made virtual bone-anchored markers to the patient's bone intraoperatively and eliminated the necessity for preoperative marker positioning or preoperative additional CT scan. Results We tested this Surface Template-Assisted Marker Positioning (STAMP) method using 5 temporal bone replicas, and in 5 ear surgeries (2 cochlear implants, 3 translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgeries) to investigate whether this method improves, or at least retains, the accuracy of image- guided surgery (IGS). The fiducial registration errors and target registration errors in the phantom study was ∼0.7 mm and ∼1.5 mm, respectively. The target registration errors in replicas were always less than 2 mm. In actual ear surgeries the fiducial registration errors were ∼0.6 mm and the target registration errors were less than 2 mm in 4 of 5 surgeries. All patients received successful cochlear implantation or tumor removal. Conclusions The new method reduced the preoperative procedures for patients but did not reduce the accuracy of the surgical navigation. Our method would be a useful IGS method in the field of otology where both accuracy and non-invasiveness are required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document