Integration Site Selection by Lentiviruses: Biology and Possible Control

Author(s):  
F. D. Bushman
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 4257-4269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew C. LaFave ◽  
Gaurav K. Varshney ◽  
Derek E. Gildea ◽  
Tyra G. Wolfsberg ◽  
Andreas D. Baxevanis ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S284
Author(s):  
Alessandra Recchia ◽  
Claudia Cattoglio ◽  
Annarita Miccio ◽  
Antonella Antonelli ◽  
Anna Testa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (14) ◽  
pp. 7250-7260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Kling ◽  
Thomas Spaller ◽  
Jana Schiefner ◽  
Doreen Bönisch ◽  
Thomas Winckler

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (19) ◽  
pp. 9702-9705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Wong ◽  
João I. Mamede ◽  
Thomas J. Hope

It has been known for a number of years that integration sites of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA show a preference for actively expressed chromosomal locations. A number of viral and cellular proteins are implicated in this process, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. Two recent breakthrough publications advance our understanding of HIV integration site selection by focusing on the localization of the preferred target genes of integration. These studies reveal that knockdown of certain nucleoporins and components of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking alter integration site preference, not by altering the trafficking of the viral genome but by altering the chromatin subtype localization relative to the structure of the nucleus. Here, we describe the link between the nuclear basket nucleoporins (Tpr and Nup153) and chromatin organization and how altering the host environment by manipulating nuclear structure may have important implications for the preferential integration of HIV into actively transcribed genes, facilitating efficient viral replication.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 569-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Lesbats ◽  
Vincent Parissi

Viruses ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeger Debyser ◽  
Gerlinde Vansant ◽  
Anne Bruggemans ◽  
Julie Janssens ◽  
Frauke Christ

Despite significant improvements in therapy, the HIV/AIDS pandemic remains an important threat to public health. Current treatments fail to eradicate HIV as proviral DNA persists in long-living cellular reservoirs, leading to viral rebound whenever treatment is discontinued. Hence, a better understanding of viral reservoir establishment and maintenance is required to develop novel strategies to destroy latently infected cells, and/or to durably silence the latent provirus in infected cells. Whereas the mechanism of integration has been well studied from a catalytic point of view, it remains unknown how integration site selection and transcription are linked. In recent years, evidence has grown that lens epithelium-derived growth factor p75 (LEDGF/p75) is the main determinant of HIV integration site selection and that the integration site affects the transcriptional state of the provirus. LEDGINs have been developed as small molecule inhibitors of the interaction between LEDGF/p75 and integrase. Recently, it was shown that LEDGIN treatment in cell culture shifts the residual integrated provirus towards the inner nuclear compartment and out of transcription units in a dose dependent manner. This LEDGIN-mediated retargeting increased the proportion of provirus with a transcriptionally silent phenotype and the residual reservoir proved refractory to reactivation in vitro. LEDGINs provide us with a research tool to study the link between integration and transcription, a quintessential question in retrovirology. LEDGIN-mediated retargeting of the residual reservoirs provides a novel potential “block-and-lock” strategy as a functional cure of HIV infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document