Isoflurane and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Neurosurgery

1975 ◽  
pp. 334-336
Author(s):  
Robert W. Adams ◽  
Gerald A. Gronert ◽  
John D. Michenfelder
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure

scholarly journals Intraocular Pressure and Estimated Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure. The Beijing Eye Study 2011

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e104267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Xing Wang ◽  
Jost B. Jonas ◽  
Ningli Wang ◽  
Qi Sheng You ◽  
Diya Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure ◽  
Beijing Eye Study

Normal Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in the Newborn

1986 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 100-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kaiser ◽  
A. G. Whitelaw
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure

Effect of altering cerebrospinal fluid pressure on spinal cord blood flow

1994 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Kazama ◽  
Yoshihiko Masaki ◽  
Shigeyoshi Maruyama ◽  
Akira Ishihara
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure ◽  
Spinal Cord Blood Flow

Progression of Normal-Tension Glaucoma After Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt to Decrease Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. e50-e52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H. Chen ◽  
Mitchell D. Drucker ◽  
Kenneth M. Louis ◽  
David W. Richards
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Normal Tension Glaucoma ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure

Venous and CSF pressure in cerebral infarction with a hemorrhagic component

1985 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-421
Author(s):  
A. A. Ashman
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure ◽  
Csf Pressure

Literature data on the value of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in certain forms of ischemic stroke are few and contradictory.

Digital manometry to measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure during lumbar puncture

2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092110551
Author(s):  
Robert Heider ◽  
Peter G Kranz ◽  
Erin Hope Weant ◽  
Linda Gray ◽  
Timothy J Amrhein
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Lumbar Puncture ◽  
Pressure Measurement ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Csf Pressure ◽  
Left Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Time Savings

Rationale and Objectives Accurate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure measurements are critical for diagnosis and treatment of pathologic processes involving the central nervous system. Measuring opening CSF pressure using an analog device takes several minutes, which can be burdensome in a busy practice. The purpose of this study was to compare accuracy of a digital pressure measurement device with analog manometry, the reference gold standard. Secondary purpose included an assessment of possible time savings. Materials and Methods This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional investigation of 71 patients who underwent image-guided lumbar puncture (LP) with opening CSF pressure measurement at a single institution from June 2019 to September 2019. Exclusion criteria were examinations without complete data for both the digital and analog measurements or without recorded needle gauge. All included LPs and CSF pressures were measured with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, legs extended. Acquired data included (1) digital and analog CSF pressures and (2) time required to measure CSF pressure. Results A total of 56 procedures were analyzed in 55 patients. There was no significant difference in mean CSF pressures between devices: 22.5 cm H2O digitally vs 23.1 analog ( p = .7). Use of the digital manometer resulted in a time savings of 6 min (438 s analog vs 78 s digital, p < .001). Conclusion Cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurements obtained with digital manometry demonstrate comparable accuracy to the reference standard of analog manometry, with an average time savings of approximately 6 min per case.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document