Bridging the Gap between a Product Design Sector and a Production Sector: Conceptualization and a Support Tool

1985 ◽  
pp. 466-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Adachi ◽  
Seiichi Kobayakawa ◽  
Humio Koh ◽  
Ichiro Inoue
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Herrmann ◽  
Mandar M. Chincholkar

Abstract This paper describes a decision support tool that can help a product development team reduce manufacturing cycle time during product design. This design for production (DFP) tool determines how manufacturing a new product design affects the performance of the manufacturing system by analyzing the capacity requirements and estimating the manufacturing cycle times. Performing these tasks early in the product development process can reduce product development time. The paper presents a comprehensive DFP approach and describes the components of the DFP tool, which gives feedback that can be used to eliminate manufacturing cycle time problems. We present an example that illustrates the tool’s functionality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 437 ◽  
pp. 404-413
Author(s):  
Xin Jin ◽  
Guo Xi Li ◽  
Jing Zhong Gong ◽  
Yue Hui Yan ◽  
Shao Xing Li

The necessity of integration of design and manufacturability was analyzed. By carrying out the research of mechanical product digital structure design and manufacturability analysis and evaluation integration technology, the roadmap of design manufacturability integration was established with support tool integration, information integration, knowledge integration, function integration and flow integration. The design manufacturability integration support system was developed. It was supported that designers could carry out manufacturability analysis and evaluation while doing structure design and finally the changes and rework of mechanical product design was reduced and the success rate of digital structure design was improved by using the system.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850007
Author(s):  
Imane Ballouki ◽  
Mohammed Douimi ◽  
Latifa Ouzizi

In the simultaneous design of product and its supply chain (SDPSC), the main criteria that is usually used to choose a product design is product cost since it is assumed that up to 70% of product cost is determined during the design phase. However, some researches recognise that product design decisions also affect the environmental impact of the product throughout its supply chain. Consequently, merging eco-design tools with the joint DPSC can develop a better understanding of the product and its environmental interactions to achieve green product development. In this paper, we present a literature review dealing with environmental principles’ integration into the SDPSC, then we investigate tools for green product design selection using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). We compare suitability of three selected MCDM methods, namely Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), and Multi-Attribute Value Theory (MAVT). Two case studies were selected from literature, and a sensitivity analysis is applied for each selected method. Results suggest that although all methods are convenient and can be used in practice, TOPSIS method was more stable towards weighting changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document