Manipulation of the Agenda by Strategic Voting: Separable and Nonseparable Preferences

Abstract In this study, we examine whether strategic voting – in which a voter seeks to maximize the expected payoff from casting a ballot – occurred among late voters in the 2018 Taipei City mayoral election. This multi-candidate mayoral contest was noteworthy because ballot-counting started before all the votes had been cast, with preliminary results being leaked to the media. Theoretically, having access to real-time updates of voting figures could have influenced the decision of voters who were still in line waiting to cast their ballots. Analysis and reconstruction of aggregate polling data, however, demonstrate that there was very little (if any) strategic voting among these late voters on election day, even if they had information that might have induced them to vote strategically.

Download Full-text

Agendas and Strategic Voting

Southern Economic Journal ◽

10.1002/j.2325-8012.1999.tb00182.x ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 65 (3) ◽

pp. 622-629

Author(s):

Charles A. Holt ◽

Lisa R. Anderson

Keyword(s):

Strategic Voting

Download Full-text

Who Votes More Strategically?

American Political Science Review ◽

10.1017/s0003055419000820 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 114 (2) ◽

pp. 470-485 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

ANDREW C. EGGERS ◽

NICK VIVYAN

Keyword(s):

Political Participation ◽

Survey Data ◽

Strategic Behavior ◽

Electoral System ◽

Strategic Voting ◽

Education Level ◽

New Approach

Strategic voting is an important explanation for aggregate political phenomena, but we know little about how strategic voting varies across types of voters. Are richer voters more strategic than poorer voters? Does strategic behavior vary with age, education, gender, or political leaning? The answers may be important for assessing how well an electoral system represents different preferences in society. We introduce a new approach to measuring and comparing strategic voting across voters that can be broadly applied, given appropriate survey data. In recent British elections, we find that older voters vote more strategically than younger voters and that richer voters vote more strategically than poorer voters, even as strategic behavior varies little across the education level. The differences in strategic voting by age and income are smaller than observed differences in turnout by age and income, but they tend to exacerbate these better-known inequalities in political participation.

Download Full-text