Hydrologic and Treatment Performance of Constructed Wetlands: The Everglades Stormwater Treatment Areas

2016 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Wossenu Abtew ◽  
Tracey Piccone ◽  
Kathleen Pietro ◽  
Shi Kui Xue
2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Stentström ◽  
A. Carlander

The interest in constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater and stormwater treatment has recently increased but data for the reduction efficiency of indicator organisms are often restricted to the water phase. In a full-scale wastewater wetland in Sweden fecal coliforms and enterococci were reduced by 97-99.9% and coliphages by approximately 70%. The factors affecting the reduction are however less well understood. In two full-scale wetlands, for stormwater and wastewater treatment, an assessment has been done of the particle associated fraction of indicator organisms. No significant differences in the particle-associated numbers were seen between the inlet and the outlet of the wetlands, but the amounts of sedimenting particles varied between the two sites. In the stormwater wetland the amount of sedimenting particles at the outlet was 3% of the amount at the inlet, while the wastewater wetland had much lower particle removal efficiency. The reduction of suspended particles seems to be the main factor for bacterial elimination from the water phase, governed by vegetation and design. In the sediment, survival of presumptive E.coli, fecal enterococci, Clostridium and coliphages were long with T90-values of 27, 27, 252 and 370 days, respectively. The organisms can however be reintroduced by resuspension. Viruses in the water phase may be of main concern for a risk assessment of receiving waters.


2014 ◽  
Vol 955-959 ◽  
pp. 2083-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Bing Chen ◽  
Uwe Kappelmeyer ◽  
Peter Kuschk

Constructed wetlands (CWs) are shown to be suitable for the treatment of water contaminated with benzene. However, due to the high sulfate concentration (around 850 mg/L) in influent, sulfate reduction will be stimulated in CWs. Subsequently, the toxicity of sulfide will be a catastrophe to the plants, and the treatment performance of CWs will be impaired. In this study, nitrite and nitrate were used as competitor with sulfate for electron acceptor to prevent the sulfate reduction. With the inflow benzene concentration ranged from 21.6-103 μg, and the accumulation of sulfide reached up to 39%, the removal efficiency of benzene decreased from 86% to 27%. However, with the addition of nitrite and nitrate, the sulfide accumulation was inhibited successfully, and the benzene removal efficiency recovered to 85%. In conclusion, both nitrite and nitrate can be an option for preventing sulfate reduction and sulfide toxicity in CWs treating sulfate-rich wastewater.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document