Cost/Risk/Benefit Analysis of Alternative Cleanup Requirements for Plutonium-Contaminated Soils on and Near the Nevada Test Site

1995 ◽  
pp. 1543-1544
Author(s):  
T. Longo ◽  
M. Merkhofer ◽  
D. Layton ◽  
L. Barker ◽  
B. Deschler ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Massad ◽  
Ben C Behrens ◽  
Francisco AB Coutinho ◽  
Ronald H Behrens

1974 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-134
Author(s):  
Dennis P. Tihansky ◽  
Harold V. Kibby

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Melvin ◽  
R. A. Sexton ◽  
M. L. Fort ◽  
S. E. Nunn

2019 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-487
Author(s):  
B Michael Moores

Abstract Cost–risk–benefit analysis has been applied to protection of the patient in diagnostic radiology with special reference to the application of referral guidelines. The analysis presented has extended previous work in this field to provide a theoretical framework that encompasses key factors that need to be considered in the optimisation of patient protection from both diagnostic and radiation risks. The fraction of patients whose symptoms do not meet criteria contained in the referral guidelines and, therefore, for whom an X-ray examination is not indicated has been termed the selectivity of the guidelines. Also included are the detriments arising from rejected or repeated examinations as well as the levels of patient dose employed in order to achieve given levels of true and false diagnostic outcomes. A comprehensive framework for optimisation is outlined and its relationship to justification discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document