Indonesian Civil Society and Human Rights Advocacy in ASEAN

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy W. Nandyatama
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Pils

The intensified and more public repression of civil society in China is part of a global shift toward deepened and technologically smarter dictatorship. This article uses the example of the ‘709’ government campaign against Chinese human rights lawyers to discuss this shift. It argues that the Party-State adopted more public and sophisticated forms of repression in reaction to smarter forms and techniques of human rights advocacy. In contrast to liberal legal advocacy, however, the Party-State’s authoritarian (or neo-totalitarian) propaganda is not bounded by rational argument. It can more fully exploit the potential of the political emotions it creates. Along with other forms of public repression, the crackdown indicates a rise of anti-liberal and anti-rationalist conceptions of law and governance and a return to the romanticisation of power.


2016 ◽  
pp. 359-374
Author(s):  
Natascha Cerny Ehtesham ◽  
Laurent Goetschel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayla Brown

This research project evaluates civil society’s perceptions of human rights advocacy and stakeholder engagement within the particular context of content governance and platform accountability. It is informed by critical theories of new media and scholarship on social movements and social change. Findings reveal that, within the context of platform accountability and content governance, organized civil society advocates for human rights by applying external pressure through media coverage and by networking directly with platform companies, many of which are hiring dedicated human rights leads and establishing more robust stakeholder engagement or governance processes; corporate interests underpin both strategies, however, the individuals interviewed identified the former as the most effective. Although organized civil society is an important counterweight to corporate power, findings reveal that business interests are still a significant barrier to enacting meaningful social change. Findings also suggest that good faith by and good actors within platform companies are ultimately not enough, reinforcing the important role organized civil society plays in increasing democratic accountability, even as private corporations begin to create processes to govern themselves.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayla Brown

This research project evaluates civil society’s perceptions of human rights advocacy and stakeholder engagement within the particular context of content governance and platform accountability. It is informed by critical theories of new media and scholarship on social movements and social change. Findings reveal that, within the context of platform accountability and content governance, organized civil society advocates for human rights by applying external pressure through media coverage and by networking directly with platform companies, many of which are hiring dedicated human rights leads and establishing more robust stakeholder engagement or governance processes; corporate interests underpin both strategies, however, the individuals interviewed identified the former as the most effective. Although organized civil society is an important counterweight to corporate power, findings reveal that business interests are still a significant barrier to enacting meaningful social change. Findings also suggest that good faith by and good actors within platform companies are ultimately not enough, reinforcing the important role organized civil society plays in increasing democratic accountability, even as private corporations begin to create processes to govern themselves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document