Biodiversity and exploitation of the main fish stocks in the Norwegian - Barents Sea ecosystem

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Hamre
2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 1245-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
George L. Hunt ◽  
Bernard A. Megrey

Abstract The eastern Bering Sea and the Barents Sea share a number of common biophysical characteristics. For example, both are seasonally ice-covered, high-latitude, shelf seas, dependent on advection for heat and for replenishment of nutrients on their shelves, and with ecosystems dominated by a single species of gadoid fish. At the same time, they differ in important respects. In the Barents Sea, advection of Atlantic Water is important for zooplankton vital to the Barents Sea productivity. Advection of zooplankton is not as important for the ecosystems of the southeastern Bering Sea, where high levels of diatom production can support production of small, neritic zooplankton. In the Barents Sea, cod are the dominant gadoid, and juvenile and older fish depend on capelin and other forage fish to repackage the energy available in copepods. In contrast, the dominant fish in the eastern Bering Sea is the walleye pollock, juveniles and adults of which consume zooplankton directly. The southeastern Bering Sea supports considerably larger fish stocks than the Barents. In part, this may reflect the greater depth of much of the Barents Sea compared with the shallow shelf of the southeastern Bering. However, walleye pollock is estimated to occupy a trophic level of 3.3 as compared to 4.3 for Barents Sea cod. This difference alone could have a major impact on the abilities of these seas to support a large biomass of gadoids. In both seas, climate-forced variability in advection and sea-ice cover can potentially have major effects on the productivity of these Subarctic seas. In the Bering Sea, the size and location of pools of cold bottom waters on the shelf may influence the likelihood of predation of juvenile pollock.


2018 ◽  
Vol 166 ◽  
pp. 4-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Eriksen ◽  
H. Gjøsæter ◽  
D. Prozorkevich ◽  
E. Shamray ◽  
A. Dolgov ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1308-1309
Author(s):  
Edda Johannesen ◽  
Randi B. Ingvaldsen ◽  
Bjarte Bogstad ◽  
Padmini Dalpadado ◽  
Elena Eriksen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 932-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrine Michalsen ◽  
Padmini Dalpadado ◽  
Elena Eriksen ◽  
Harald Gjøsæter ◽  
Randi B. Ingvaldsen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 472 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. G. Matishov ◽  
G. V. Ilyin ◽  
I. S. Usyagina ◽  
D. V. Moiseev ◽  
Salve Dahle ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 1375-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frode Vikebø ◽  
Svein Sundby ◽  
Bjørn Ådlandsvik ◽  
Øyvind Fiksen

Abstract Temperature has been identified in field studies as the physical parameter most influential on growth and recruitment of Arcto-Norwegian cod. However, it has been pointed out by many authors that temperature in this context has not only direct effects on the cod, but also indirect effects through lower trophic levels. Moreover, it has been said that temperature might also be a proxy for other climatic parameters. The present paper analyses the direct quantitative effects of temperature on larval and pelagic juvenile growth from spawning in Lofoten until the 0-group fish settle in the Barents Sea. The approach taken is that of a modelling study, supported by analysis of existing data on fish stocks and climate. It is shown that transport and temperature alone can reproduce key features of the 0-group weight distribution and concentration in the Barents Sea for two consecutive years. The extent of the dispersion of the larvae and pelagic juveniles, as well as the ambient temperature they experience on their route, are shown to depend upon their depth in the water column and, to a lesser degree, the time of spawning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document