Differential prognosis of reading-disabled children as a function of gender, socieconomic status, IQ, and severity: A longitudinal study

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
MicheleC. Labuda ◽  
J.C. Defries

1984 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Baker ◽  
Sadie N. Decker ◽  
J. C. DeFries


1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Patton ◽  
Donald K. Routh ◽  
Stuart I. Offenbach


2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola R. Gómez-Velázquez ◽  
Andrés A. González-Garrido ◽  
Daniel Zarabozo ◽  
J. L. Oropeza de Alba


1985 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-193
Author(s):  
Cecile L. Stein ◽  
Edgar B. Zurif ◽  
Helen S. Cairns

At the outset we wish to thank the editors of Applied Psycholinguistics for inviting us to reply to Goodluck's criticisms of our paper, “Sentence Comprehension Limitations Related to Syntactic Deficits in Reading Disabled Children” (Vol. 5, No. 4). Our response can be summarized in two points: First, the theoretical questions raised by Goodluck are largely unresolved and premature. Second, and most important, is the point that however the theoretical issues are ultimately resolved, one of the basic conclusions of the Stein, Cairns, and Zurif article remains unassailed – viz., that the interpretation of temporal complement constructions in English reveals a deficit in the grammatical System of some reading disabled children. This note will bear an organization analogous to that of Goodluck.



NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 589
Author(s):  
Kenneth R. Pugh ◽  
Bennett A. Shaywitz ◽  
Sally E. Shaywitz ◽  
W.Einar Mencl ◽  
Annette R. Jenner ◽  
...  


1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 386-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avital Deutsch ◽  
Shlomo Bentin


1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Condor ◽  
Vicki Anderson ◽  
Michael Saling


Cortex ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Corballis ◽  
Lindy Macadie ◽  
Ivan L. Beale


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document