The pathology of the human muscle spindle

1974 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. De Reuck
Keyword(s):  
1969 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Spiro ◽  
R. L. Beilin
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stylianos Papaioannou ◽  
Michael Dimitriou

AbstractVoluntary movements are believed to be advantageously prepared before they are executed, but the neural mechanisms at work have been unclear. For example, there are no overt changes in skeletal muscle activity during movement preparation. Here, using a delayed-reach manual task, we demonstrate a decrease in the firing rate of human muscle afferents (primary spindles) when preparing stretch rather than shortening of the spindle-bearing muscle. This goal-dependent modulation of proprioceptors begun early after target onset but was markedly stronger at the latter parts of the preparatory period. In two additional experiments, whole-arm perturbations during reach preparation revealed a congruent modulation of stretch reflex gains of shoulder and upper arm muscles. Our study shows that movement preparation can involve sensory elements of the peripheral nervous system. We suggest that central preparatory activity can also reflect sensory control, and preparatory tuning of muscle spindle mechanoreceptors is a component of planned reaching movements.


1976 ◽  
Vol 261 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Burke ◽  
K E Hagbarth ◽  
L Löfstedt ◽  
B G Wallin

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1314-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. B. Edin ◽  
A. B. Vallbo

1. A sample of 124 human muscle afferents originating from the finger extensor muscles were recorded from the radial nerve in the upper arm. A method is described to formalize the classification of units in muscle spindle primary and secondary afferents and Golgi tendon organ afferents on the basis of a few, nonrigorous assumptions. The classification was based on experimental data that largely have been described in a series of previous papers, although some additional data were collected in the present study. 2. The units were subjected to five tests providing identification data: twitch contraction test, ramp-and-hold stretch, small-amplitude sinusoidal stretches superimposed on ramp stretch, stretch sensitization, and isometric contraction/relaxation. From these five tests the following eight response features were extracted: response to maximal isometric twitch contractions, type of stretch sensitization, correlation between discharge rate and contractile force, response to sudden isometric relaxation, presence or absence of an initial burst, deceleration response, prompt silencing at slow muscle shortening, and driving by small-amplitude sinusoidal stretches. 3. A Bayesian decision procedure was adopted to classify the units on the basis of the eight discriminators. As a first step, units were provisionally classified into muscle spindle primary and secondary afferents, and Golgi tendon organ afferents, by intuitively weighting their responses to the identification tests. Prior probabilities were estimated on the basis of the provisional classification. The eight response features were analyzed and tabulated for all afferents, and the likelihood functions of the tests were directly calculated on the basis of these data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document