Retention of both parental mitochondrial DNA species in mouse-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids

1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Zuckerman ◽  
Joseph F. Solus ◽  
Frances P. Gillespie ◽  
Jerome M. Eisenstadt
1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1951-1957
Author(s):  
F P Gillespie ◽  
T H Hong ◽  
J M Eisenstadt

We examined the mitochondrial transcription and translation products of somatic cell hybrids constructed by the fusion of Chinese hamster and mouse cells. The hybrid cell lines OAC-k, OAC-l, and OAC-m contain approximately equal amounts of hamster and mouse mitochondrial DNA and produced mitochondrial rRNA from both parental species in the same ratio. Cell lines OAC-k, OAC-l, and OAC-m also produced poly(A)+ mouse mitochondrial RNA transcripts comparable in complexity and quantity to poly(A)+ RNA from the mouse parent. However, the overall level of poly(A)+ hamster mitochondrial RNA from these hybrids was significantly reduced compared with that from the hamster parent. The hybrid cells also lacked several poly(A)+ RNA species found in the hamster parent, but contained additional minor transcripts. The mitochondrially coded proteins of the OAC-k, OAC-l, and OAC-m cells were predominantly encoded by the mouse mitochondrial DNA.


1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1951-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
F P Gillespie ◽  
T H Hong ◽  
J M Eisenstadt

We examined the mitochondrial transcription and translation products of somatic cell hybrids constructed by the fusion of Chinese hamster and mouse cells. The hybrid cell lines OAC-k, OAC-l, and OAC-m contain approximately equal amounts of hamster and mouse mitochondrial DNA and produced mitochondrial rRNA from both parental species in the same ratio. Cell lines OAC-k, OAC-l, and OAC-m also produced poly(A)+ mouse mitochondrial RNA transcripts comparable in complexity and quantity to poly(A)+ RNA from the mouse parent. However, the overall level of poly(A)+ hamster mitochondrial RNA from these hybrids was significantly reduced compared with that from the hamster parent. The hybrid cells also lacked several poly(A)+ RNA species found in the hamster parent, but contained additional minor transcripts. The mitochondrially coded proteins of the OAC-k, OAC-l, and OAC-m cells were predominantly encoded by the mouse mitochondrial DNA.


1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-346
Author(s):  
C E Campbell ◽  
R G Worton

Somatic cell hybrids heterozygous at the emetine resistance locus (emtr/emt+) or the chromate resistance locus (chrr/chr+) are known to segregate the recessive drug resistance phenotype at high frequency. We have examined mechanisms of segregation in Chinese hamster cell hybrids heterozygous at these two loci, both of which map to the long arm of Chinese hamster chromosome 2. To follow the fate of chromosomal arms through the segregation process, our hybrids were also heterozygous at the mtx (methotrexate resistance) locus on the short arm of chromosome 2 and carried cytogenetically marked chromosomes with either a short-arm deletion (2p-) or a long-arm addition (2q+). Karyotype and phenotype analysis of emetine- or chromate-resistant segregants from such hybrids allowed us to distinguish four potential segregation mechanisms: (i) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome; (ii) mitotic recombination between the centromere and the emt or chr loci, giving rise to homozygous resistant segregants; (iii) inactivation of the emt+ or chr+ alleles; and (iv) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome with duplication of the homologous chromosome carrying the emtr or chrr allele. Of 48 independent segregants examined, only 9 (20%) arose by simple chromosome loss. Two segregants (4%) were consistent with a gene inactivation mechanism, but because of their rarity, other mechanisms such as mutation or submicroscopic deletion could not be excluded. Twenty-one segregants (44%) arose by either mitotic recombination or chromosome loss and duplication; the two mechanisms were not distinguishable in that experiment. Finally, in hybrids allowing these two mechanisms to be distinguished, 15 segregants (31%) arose by chromosome loss and duplication, and none arose by mitotic recombination.


1973 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ans Jongsma ◽  
Harry Someren ◽  
Andries Westerveld ◽  
Ann Hagemeijer ◽  
Peter Pearson

1974 ◽  
Vol 24 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meera Khan ◽  
W.R.T. Los ◽  
P.L. Pearson ◽  
A. Westerveld ◽  
D. Bootsma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document