Nonperturbative light cone quantum field theory beyond the tree level

1992 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Heinzl ◽  
S. Krusche ◽  
S. Simbürger ◽  
E. Werner
1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Heinzl ◽  
S. Krusche ◽  
E. Werner

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 4179-4194 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASSIMO BLASONE ◽  
ANTONIO CAPOLUPO ◽  
CHUENG-RYONG JI ◽  
GIUSEPPE VITIELLO

In the context of quantum field theory (QFT), we compute the amplitudes of weak interaction processes such as W+ →e+ + νe and W+ →e+ + νμ by using different representations of flavor states for mixed neutrinos. Analyzing the short time limit of the above amplitudes, we find that the neutrino states defined in QFT as eigenstates of the flavor charges lead to results consistent with lepton charge conservation. On the contrary, the Pontecorvo flavor states produce a violation of lepton charge in the vertex, which is in contrast with what expected at tree level in the Standard Model.


1991 ◽  
Vol 532 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Th. Heinzl ◽  
St. Krusche ◽  
E. Warner

1991 ◽  
Vol 256 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Th. Heinzl ◽  
St. Krusche ◽  
E. Werner

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 1550103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Addazi ◽  
Giampiero Esposito

The realization of a nonlocal quantum field theory without losing unitarity, gauge invariance and causality is investigated. It is commonly retained that such a formulation is possible at tree level, but at quantum level acausality is expected to reappear at one loop. We suggest that the problem of acausality is, in a broad sense, similar to the one about anomalies in quantum field theory. By virtue of this analogy, we suggest that acausal diagrams resulting from the fermionic sector and the bosonic one might cancel each other, with a suitable content of fields and suitable symmetries. As a simple example, we show how supersymmetry can alleviate this problem in a simple and elegant way, i.e. by leading to exact cancellations of harmful diagrams, to all orders of perturbation theory. An infinite number of divergent diagrams cancel each other by virtue of the nonrenormalization theorem of supersymmetry. However, supersymmetry is not enough to protect a theory from all acausal divergences. For instance, acausal contributions to supersymmetric corrections to D-terms are not protected by supersymmetry. On the other hand, we show in detail how supersymmetry also helps in dealing with D-terms: divergences are not canceled but they become softer than in the nonsupersymmetric case. The supergraphs' formalism turns out to be a powerful tool to reduce the complexity of perturbative calculations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document