Additional factor XII (hageman factor) deficiency in hemophilia a and in von willebrand syndrome

1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Barthels ◽  
J. Edel ◽  
B. Liese ◽  
H. E. Karges
Author(s):  
Liaqat Ali Chaudhry ◽  
Wael Yasin Mohamed El-Sadek ◽  
Ghazala Aslam Chaudhry ◽  
Feddha Eid Al-Atawi

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (03) ◽  
pp. 526-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Schved ◽  
J C Gris ◽  
S Neveu ◽  
P Mares ◽  
C Sarlat

1977 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 779-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
George R. Buchanan ◽  
Daniel M. Green ◽  
Robert I. Handin

2015 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Arphan Azaad ◽  
Qiurong Zhang ◽  
Yongping Li

1983 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 713-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gamba ◽  
G. Grignani ◽  
P. Longoni ◽  
E. Ascari

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter-Michael Halbmayer ◽  
Alexander Haushofer ◽  
Johannes Radek ◽  
Renate Schön ◽  
Manfred Deutsch ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (03) ◽  
pp. 514-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Morgenschweis ◽  
Rainer Zotz ◽  
Ulrich Budde ◽  
Rüdiger Scharf ◽  
Irene Bux-Gewehr

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (01) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Köhler ◽  
P Hellstern ◽  
C Miyashita ◽  
G von Blohn ◽  
E Wenzel

SummaryThis study was performed to evaluate the influence of different routes of administration on the efficacy of DDAVP treatment. Ten healthy volunteers received DDAVP intranasally (i.n.), subcutaneously (s.c.) and intravenously (i.v.) in a randomized cross-over trial. Factor XII and high molecular weight (HMW)-kininogen levels increased only slightly after DDAVP administration. The mean increase of factor VIII: C was 3.1 (i. v.), 2.3 (s. c.), and 1.3 (i.n.) - fold over baseline. Ristocetin cofactor (von Willebrand factor antigen) increased 3.1 (2.5), 2.0 (2.3) and 1.2 (1.2) - fold over baseline mean values after i.v., s.c. and i.n. DDAVP, respectively. The half-disappearance time of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor (vWF) after DDAVP ranged from five (factor VIII: C) to eight hours (vWF). The mean increase of fibrinolytic activity was more pronounced after i.v. DDAVP. The antidiuretic effect was moderate with no apparent differences between the routes of application. This study provides further evidence that both i.v. and s.c. DDAVP administration result in an appropriate and reliable stimulation of haemostasis. An additional advantage of s. c. administration is its suitability for home treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document