Remembering an era: Roger penrose’s paper on “gravitational collapse: the role of general relativity”

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Flavio Mercati

Shape Dynamics (SD) is a field theory that describes gravity in a different way than General Relativity (GR): it assumes a preferred notion of simultaneity, and the dynamical content of the theory consists of conformal 3- geometries. SD coincides with (GR) in most situations, in particular in the experimentally well-tested regimes, but it departs from it in some strong-gravity situations, for example at cosmological singularities or upon gravitational collapse. This chapter provides a quick introduction to the theory and a brief description of its present state.


2014 ◽  
Vol 563 ◽  
pp. A85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Vaytet ◽  
Kengo Tomida ◽  
Gilles Chabrier

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 2353-2359 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. I. COOPERSTOCK ◽  
M. J. DUPRE

In this essay, we introduce a new approach to energy–momentum in general relativity. Space–time, as opposed to space, is recognized as the necessary arena for its examination, leading us to define new extended space–time energy and momentum constructs. From local and global considerations, we conclude that the Ricci tensor is the required element for a localized expression of energy–momentum to include the gravitational field. We present and rationalize a fully invariant extended expression for space–time energy, guided by Tolman's well-known energy integral for an arbitrary bounded stationary system. This raises fundamental issues which we discuss. The role of the observer emerges naturally and we are led to an extension of the uncertainty principle to general relativity, of particular relevance to ultra-strong gravity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2041012
Author(s):  
Pedro D. Alvarez ◽  
Mauricio Valenzuela ◽  
Jorge Zanelli

General Relativity (GR) and the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics are two enormously successful frameworks for our understanding the fundamental laws of nature. However, these theoretical schemes are widely disconnected, logically independent and unrelated in scope. Yet, GR and SM at some point must intersect, producing claims about phenomena that should be reconciled. Be it as it may, both schemes share a common basic ground: symmetry under local Lorentz transformations. Here, we will focus on the consequences of assuming this feature from the beginning to combine geometry, matter fields and gauge interactions. We give a rough description of how this could be instrumental for the construction of a unified scheme of gravitation and particle physics.


1973 ◽  
Vol 28 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 529-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Reinhardt

AbstractAfter a short historical introduction it is discussed how far Mach's principle is incorporated into general relativity. The possible role of Mach's principle as a selection rule for the solutions of Einstein's field equations is summarized. Then follows a discussion of Math's principle in theories of gravitation other than Einstein's, mainly the Brans-Dicke theory. Finally the experiments on the isotropy of inertial mass and their consequence for Mach's principle are described. The conclusion is that Mach's principle, though an extremely stimulating thought, has at present little claim to be a basic physical principle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document