Erkenntnisfortschritt in der Rechnungslegung durch experimentelle Forschung? — Diskussion methodischer Grundsatzfragen anhand der Entscheidungsnützlichkeit des Performance Reporting

2013 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 622-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karola Bastini ◽  
Rainer Kasperzak

2021 ◽  
pp. 107755872199892
Author(s):  
Morgan C. Shields

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting Program in 2012, which publicly reports facilities’ performance on restraint and seclusion (R-S) measures. Using data from Massachusetts, we examined whether nonprofits and for-profits responded differently to the program on targeted indicators, and if the program had a differential spillover effect on nontargeted indicators of quality by ownership. Episodes of R-S (targeted), complaints (nontargeted), and discharges were obtained for 2008-2017 through public records requests to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Using difference-in-differences estimators, we found no differential changes in R-S between for-profits and nonprofits. However, for-profits had larger increases in overall complaints, safety-related complaints, abuse-related complaints, and R-S-related complaints compared with nonprofits. This is the first study to examine the effects of a national public reporting program among psychiatric facilities on nontargeted measures. Researchers and policymakers should further scrutinize intended and unintended consequences of performance-reporting programs.



Author(s):  
Pawan Chowdhary ◽  
Themis Palpanas ◽  
Florian Pinel ◽  
Shyh-kwei Chen ◽  
Frederick Wu


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 380-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Scott Asay ◽  
Robert Libby ◽  
Kristina Rennekamp




2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Leeb

For numerous countries, including Canada, regular health system performance reporting has become increasingly routine if not mandated by legislation. In Canada, the health system performance reporting agenda includes multiple players at all levels from national organizations to provincial health (quality) councils and others. Canada, like many other countries, also participates in international health system performance reporting initiatives. Making sense of what all of these reporting initiatives are telling us about health system performance both within Canada and compared to other countries is becoming increasingly more challenging. For almost 20 years, the Canadian Institute for Health Information has worked with provinces, territories, and other key partners to develop comparable, standardized pan-Canadian performance indicators. Throughout this process, many lessons have been identified including the actionability one can reasonably expect from public reporting initiatives. This article outlines some of the key aspects of these lessons.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document