scholarly journals Almost-extreme Khovanov spectra

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Cantero Morán ◽  
Marithania Silvero

AbstractWe introduce a functor from the cube to the Burnside 2-category and prove that it is equivalent to the Khovanov spectrum given by Lipshitz and Sarkar in the almost-extreme quantum grading. We provide a decomposition of this functor into simplicial complexes. This decomposition allows us to compute the homotopy type of the almost-extreme Khovanov spectra of diagrams without alternating pairs.

Author(s):  
Joseph Chuang ◽  
Julian Holstein ◽  
Andrey Lazarev

AbstractWe study Maurer–Cartan moduli spaces of dg algebras and associated dg categories and show that, while not quasi-isomorphism invariants, they are invariants of strong homotopy type, a natural notion that has not been studied before. We prove, in several different contexts, Schlessinger–Stasheff type theorems comparing the notions of homotopy and gauge equivalence for Maurer–Cartan elements as well as their categorified versions. As an application, we re-prove and generalize Block–Smith’s higher Riemann–Hilbert correspondence, and develop its analogue for simplicial complexes and topological spaces.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 121-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Margolis ◽  
John Rhodes ◽  
Pedro V. Silva

It is proved that the fundamental groups of boolean representable simplicial complexes (BRSC) are free and the rank is determined by the number and nature of the connected components of their graph of flats for dimension [Formula: see text]. In the case of dimension 2, it is shown that BRSC have the homotopy type of a wedge of spheres of dimensions 1 and 2. Also, in the case of dimension 2, necessary and sufficient conditions for shellability and being sequentially Cohen–Macaulay are determined. Complexity bounds are provided for all the algorithms involved.


Author(s):  
Ehud Hrushovski ◽  
François Loeser

This chapter examines the simplifications occurring in the proof of the main theorem in the smooth case. It begins by stating the theorem about the existence of an F-definable homotopy h : I × unit vector X → unit vector X and the properties for h. It then presents the proof, which depends on two lemmas. The first recaps the proof of Theorem 11.1.1, but on a Zariski dense open set V₀ only. The second uses smoothness to enable a stronger form of inflation, serving to move into V₀. The chapter also considers the birational character of the definable homotopy type in Remark 12.2.4 concerning a birational invariant.


10.37236/1245 ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Art M. Duval

Björner and Wachs generalized the definition of shellability by dropping the assumption of purity; they also introduced the $h$-triangle, a doubly-indexed generalization of the $h$-vector which is combinatorially significant for nonpure shellable complexes. Stanley subsequently defined a nonpure simplicial complex to be sequentially Cohen-Macaulay if it satisfies algebraic conditions that generalize the Cohen-Macaulay conditions for pure complexes, so that a nonpure shellable complex is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay. We show that algebraic shifting preserves the $h$-triangle of a simplicial complex $K$ if and only if $K$ is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay. This generalizes a result of Kalai's for the pure case. Immediate consequences include that nonpure shellable complexes and sequentially Cohen-Macaulay complexes have the same set of possible $h$-triangles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 041102
Author(s):  
Y. Lee ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
S. M. Oh ◽  
D. Lee ◽  
B. Kahng
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Cesare Gallozzi

Abstract We introduce a family of (k, h)-interpretations for 2 ≤ k ≤ ∞ and 1 ≤ h ≤ ∞ of constructive set theory into type theory, in which sets and formulas are interpreted as types of homotopy level k and h, respectively. Depending on the values of the parameters k and h, we are able to interpret different theories, like Aczel’s CZF and Myhill’s CST. We also define a proposition-as-hproposition interpretation in the context of logic-enriched type theories. The rest of the paper is devoted to characterising and analysing the interpretations considered. The formulas valid in the prop-as-hprop interpretation are characterised in terms of the axiom of unique choice. We also analyse the interpretations of CST into homotopy type theory, providing a comparative analysis with Aczel’s interpretation. This is done by formulating in a logic-enriched type theory the key principles used in the proofs of the two interpretations. Finally, we characterise a class of sentences valid in the (k, ∞)-interpretations in terms of the ΠΣ axiom of choice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document