scholarly journals Prophylactic transanal irrigation for low anterior resection syndrome following rectal resection

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-343
Author(s):  
H. Rosen ◽  
J. Hebenstreit ◽  
G. Möslein ◽  
W. Kneist ◽  
G. Liebig-Hörl ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Deoti e Silva Rodrigues ◽  
Franciele Rodrigues ◽  
Kelly C.L.R. Buzatti ◽  
Renato G. Campanati ◽  
Magda M. Profeta da Luz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (21) ◽  
pp. 1226-1230
Author(s):  
Rebecca Embleton ◽  
Michelle Henderson

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a collection of symptoms that can occur as a result of a low anterior resection for bowel cancer. Transanal irrigation (TAI) can be used to manage these symptoms. This article describes a retrospective audit of 15 patients who were using TAI to manage symptoms of LARS. The aim of the audit was to ascertain whether the use of TAI improved outcomes for these patients. The data suggest that TAI has reduced both the frequency of bowel movements and episodes of faecal incontinence. Those patients using higher volumes of water seem to have experienced more benefit than those patients using lower volumes of water. These findings are consistent with current literature around TAI for LARS and suggest research into optimum volume of water would be beneficial.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 148-154
Author(s):  
Jan Grosek ◽  
Jurij Aleš Košir ◽  
Jerica Novak ◽  
Mirko Omejc ◽  
Aleš Tomažič ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. Methods The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated following international recommendations. The Slovenian version of the LARS questionnaire was completed by patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. An anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function on lifestyle was included. To assess test-retest reliability, some of the patients answered the LARS score questionnaire twice. Results A total of 100 patients (66.7%) of the 150 patients who were contacted for participation, were included in the final analysis. A total of 58 patients reported major LARS score. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not (p<0.001), and between total and partial mesorectal excision (p<0.001). Age was not associated with a greater LARS score (p=0.975). There was a perfect fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score in 66.0% of cases and a moderate fit was found in 24.0% of the cases, showing good convergent validity. Test-retest reliability of 51 patients showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86. Conclusions The Slovenian translation of the LARS score is a valid tool for measuring LARS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document