Arthroscopic meniscus repair: inside-out technique vs. Biofix meniscus arrow

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franky Steenbrugge ◽  
Ren� Verdonk ◽  
Chan H�rel ◽  
Koen Verstraete
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596711878854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Karns ◽  
Daniel L. Jones ◽  
Dane C. Todd ◽  
Travis G. Maak ◽  
Stephen K. Aoki ◽  
...  

Background: Few studies have investigated the influence of patient-specific variables or procedure-specific factors on the overall cost of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in an ambulatory surgery setting. Purpose: To determine patient- and procedure-specific factors influencing the overall direct cost of outpatient arthroscopic ACLR utilizing a unique value-driven outcomes (VDO) tool. Study Design: Cohort study (economic and decision analysis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All ACLRs performed by 4 surgeons over 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Cost data were derived from the VDO tool. Patient-specific variables included age, body mass index, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, smoking status, preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Testing (PF-CAT) score, and preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. Procedure-specific variables included graft type, revision status, associated injuries and procedures, time from injury to ACLR, surgeon, and operating room (OR) time. Multivariate analysis determined patient- and procedure-related predictors of total direct costs. Results: There were 293 autograft reconstructions, 110 allograft reconstructions, and 31 hybrid reconstructions analyzed. Patient-specific factors did not significantly influence the ACLR cost. The mean OR time was shorter for allograft reconstruction ( P < .001). Predictors of an increased direct cost included the use of an allograft or hybrid graft (44.5% and 33.1% increase, respectively; P < .001), increased OR time (0.3% increase per minute; P < .001), surgeon 3 or 4 (9.1% or 5.9% increase, respectively; P < .001 or P = .001, respectively), and concomitant meniscus repair (24.4% increase; P < .001). Within the meniscus repair cohort, all-inside, root, and combined repairs correlated with a 15.5%, 31.4%, and 53.2% increased mean direct cost, respectively, compared with inside-out repairs ( P < .001). Conclusion: This study failed to identify modifiable patient-specific factors influencing direct costs of ACLR. Allografts and hybrid grafts were associated with an increased total direct cost. Meniscus repair independently predicted an increased direct cost, with all-inside, root, and combined repairs being costlier than inside-out repairs. The time-saving potential of all-inside meniscus repair was not realized in this study, making implant use a significant factor in the overall cost of ACLR with meniscus repair.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 100619
Author(s):  
Michael G. Rizzo ◽  
Max N. Seiter ◽  
Anthony R. Martin ◽  
Dylan N. Greif ◽  
Allan D. Levi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Robert A. Magnussen ◽  
Richard C. Mather ◽  
Dean C. Taylor ◽  
Claude T. Moorman
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Koukoulias ◽  
Stergios Papastergiou ◽  
Konstantinos Kazakos ◽  
Georgios Poulios ◽  
Konstantinos Parisis

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick J. Watson ◽  
Robert A. Arciero
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (7_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0006
Author(s):  
J. Richard Steadman ◽  
Bernardo Crespo ◽  
Nicholas Johnson ◽  
Lauren Matheny ◽  
Karen K. Briggs
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document