Anatomy-mimetic design preserves natural kinematics of knee joint in patient-specific mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1465-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Hwa-Yong Lee ◽  
Heoung-Jae Chun ◽  
Hyo-Jeong Kim ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuck Min Kwon ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, patellofemoral joint degeneration is a contraindication to medial UKA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of medial UKA using fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) design prostheses on the patellofemoral joint. Methods A three-dimensional finite-element model of a normal knee joint was developed using medical image data. We performed statistical analysis for each model. The differences in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint and the quadriceps force between the FB and MB designs were evaluated under a deep-knee-bend condition. Results At an early flexion angle, the results of contact stress showed no significant difference between the FB and MB medial UKA models compared with the intact model. However, at high flexion angles, we observed a significant increase in contact stress with the FB models compared with the intact model. On the contrary, in the case of the MB models, we found no statistically significant increment compared with the intact model. A larger quadriceps force was needed to produce an identical flexion angle for both the FB and MB UKA designs than for the intact model. At high flexion angles, a significant increase quadriceps force whit the FB model compared with the intact model. Conclusions Our results indicate that with medial UKA, the contact stress increased and greater quadriceps force was applied to the patellofemoral joint. However, performing UKA on a patellofemoral joint with osteoarthritis should not be difficult, unless anterior knee pain is present, because the increase in contact stress is negligible.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuck Min Kwon ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint. However, patellofemoral (PF) joint degeneration is a contraindication to medial UKA. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical effect on the PF joint in medial UKA using fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) design prostheses. Methods A three-dimensional finite-element model of a normal knee joint was developed using medical image data. We performed statistical analysis for each model. The differences in the contact stress on the PF joint and the quadriceps force between the FB and MB designs were evaluated under a deep-knee-bend condition. Results At an early flexion angle, the results of the contact stress were showed that there was no significant difference between the FB and MB medial UKA models compared with the intact model. However, at a large flexion angle, we observed a significant increase in the contact stress of FB models. On the contrary, in the case of the MB models, there was no statistically significant increment compared to the intact model. Our results indicate that with medial UKA, the contact stress increased, and a greater quadriceps force was applied to the PF joint. However, there should be no difficulty in performing UKA on a PF joint with OA, unless there is anterior knee pain. This is because the increase in the contact stress is negligible. Conclusions Our results showed that there was no significant difference in contact stress on the PF joint between medial UKA and intact knee joints. In particular, such a mechanism was easily found in mobile-bearing medial UKA. Therefore, this study biomechanically showed that degenerative changes in the PF joint should not be considered an absolute contraindication for treatment with medial UKA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuck Min Kwon ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, patellofemoral joint degeneration is a contraindication to medial UKA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of medial UKA using fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) design prostheses on the patellofemoral joint. Methods A three-dimensional finite-element model of a normal knee joint was developed using medical image data. We performed statistical analysis for each model. The differences in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint and the quadriceps force between the FB and MB designs were evaluated under a deep-knee-bend condition.Results At an early flexion angle, the results of contact stress showed no significant difference between the FB and MB medial UKA models and the intact model. However, at large flexion angles, we observed a significant increase in contact stress with the FB models. On the contrary, in the case of the MB models, we found no statistically significant increment compared with the intact model. Our results indicate that with medial UKA, the contact stress increased and greater quadriceps force was applied to the patellofemoral joint. However, performing UKA on a patellofemoral joint with osteoarthritis should not be difficult, unless anterior knee pain is present, because the increase in contact stress is negligible. Conclusions Our results show no significant difference in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint between the medial UKA and intact knee joint models. Such a mechanism was easily found in MB medial UKA. Therefore, this study biomechanically showed that degenerative changes in the patellofemoral joint should not be considered an absolute contraindication to treatment with medial UKA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuck Min Kwon ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, patellofemoral joint degeneration is a contraindication to medial UKA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of medial UKA using fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) design prostheses on the patellofemoral joint.Methods A three-dimensional finite-element model of a normal knee joint was developed using medical image data. We performed statistical analysis for each model. The differences in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint and the quadriceps force between the FB and MB designs were evaluated under a deep-knee-bend condition.Results At an early flexion angle, the results of contact stress showed no significant difference between the FB and MB medial UKA models and the intact model. However, at large flexion angles, we observed a significant increase in contact stress with the FB models. On the contrary, in the case of the MB models, we found no statistically significant increment compared with the intact model. Our results indicate that with medial UKA, the contact stress increased and greater quadriceps force was applied to the patellofemoral joint. However, performing UKA on a patellofemoral joint with osteoarthritis should not be difficult, unless anterior knee pain is present, because the increase in contact stress is negligible.Conclusions Our results show no significant difference in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint between the medial UKA and intact knee joint models. Such a mechanism was easily found in MB medial UKA. Therefore, this study biomechanically showed that degenerative changes in the patellofemoral joint should not be considered an absolute contraindication to treatment with medial UKA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document