FEA-aided design of multi-stage drawing process and tooling for production of a miniature sheet metal component

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (9-12) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. Chan ◽  
M. W. Fu ◽  
N. Li ◽  
J. Lu
Author(s):  
Arun Shivaram ◽  
Nagi G. Naganathan

Abstract Given the design of a sheet metal component that is to be produced by pressworking, there can be more than one design for the die to produce that component. It will be desirable if a mechanism exists to identify the better of the design alternatives. A method referred to as Die Producibility Evaluation Method (DPEM) is presented in this paper to evaluate the design of a given pressworking die. The method involves identification and classification of the parameters involved in the design and operation of the pressworking die. These parameters are categorized as design cost factors and process cost factors. For a given die design, the design and process cost factors are identified and the results are tabulated in the DPEM table. In order to illustrate the method, a particular sheet metal component is chosen. A set of dies required to produce this component is then designed by a novice designer. This design is referred to as the initial design. The Die Producibility Evaluation Method is applied to the initial design, the DPEM table is updated, and an improved design is identified based on the evaluations recorded in the DPEM table. In order to provide a measure of quality, a second design is carried out under the guidance of an expert designer and is referred to as the reference design. It is shown that the improved design closely matches the reference design, thus illustrating the level of performance and applicability of the Die Producibility Evaluation Method.


2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 102794
Author(s):  
Maninder Sehmi ◽  
Jesper Christensen ◽  
Christophe Bastien ◽  
Alexis Wilson ◽  
Stratis Kanarachos

2013 ◽  
Vol 554-557 ◽  
pp. 1806-1813
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Sagström ◽  
Nils Krister Persson ◽  
Åsa Lundevall

The high investment cost and long lead-time to design and manufacture a forming tool is a major obstacle for local manufacturing of products in sheet metal. To minimize resource consumption large efforts are put into increase material efficiency by reducing the thickness of the sheet and move towards production methods with less scrap percentage. Nevertheless, the scrap portion is still high, in the automotive industry often as high as 50%. This paper discuss the possibilities of introducing knitting of metal wire into metal engineering industry to manufacture scrap free, light-weight three dimensional components in metal. Knitting could be a way of obtaining material efficient production within metal engineering industry especially for small and medium sized enterprises, SME. A knitting machine is able to produce large amounts of products at low price with moderate investments costs. For certain products knitting offer a simplified production of ready formed, 3D components. Experiments with knitting stainless steel wire were performed in order to establish the possibilities and limits of knitting today as well as identify development possibilities. The experiments covered improving the stiffness of the metal knit-wear by using different knitting techniques as well as introducing subsequent manufacturing steps such as surface treatment and joining. Demonstrators where produces for a number of geometries; squares, rectangles, boxes, hour-glass like in 2D and tubular, conical and T-tube shaped in 3D. For two geometries produced with knitting and sheet metal forming the material efficiency was compared. The first geometry used 32 % less material in the knitted product compared to the sheet metal component. The second geometry used 72 % less material in the knitted component compared to the sheet metal component. However, properties like strength and stiffness will be considerable less for a knitted component than for a sheet metal component. Today applications for the knitted materials have to be chosen carefully to take advantage of the potential of the material. With further development of both the knitting technique and subsequent operations the process will open new possibilities of material efficient and light-weight manufacturing.


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1129-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. R. K. Prasad ◽  
P. Selvaraj ◽  
P. V. Ayachit ◽  
B. V. Nagamani ◽  
R. K. Ramanathan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document