Time Dependence in Mixture Toxicity with Soft Electrophiles: 1. Combined Effects of Selected SN2- and SNAr-Reactive Agents with a Nonpolar Narcotic

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Gagan ◽  
M. W. Hull ◽  
T. W. Schultz ◽  
G. Pöch ◽  
D. A. Dawson
Toxicology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 326 ◽  
pp. 153-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Dawson ◽  
Erin M.G. Allen ◽  
Joshua L. Allen ◽  
Hannah J. Baumann ◽  
Heather M. Bensinger ◽  
...  

Toxics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Afolarin O. Ogungbemi ◽  
Riccardo Massei ◽  
Rolf Altenburger ◽  
Stefan Scholz ◽  
Eberhard Küster

Risk assessment of chemicals is usually conducted for individual chemicals whereas mixtures of chemicals occur in the environment. Considering that neuroactive chemicals are a group of contaminants that dominate the environment, it is then imperative to understand the combined effects of mixtures. The commonly used models to predict mixture effects, namely concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA), are thought to be suitable for mixtures of similarly or dissimilarly acting components, respectively. For mixture toxicity prediction, one important challenge is to clarify whether to group neuroactive substances based on similar mechanisms of action, e.g., same molecular target or rather similar toxicological response, e.g., hyper- or hypoactivity (effect direction). We addressed this by using the spontaneous tail coiling (STC) of zebrafish embryos, which represents the earliest observable motor activity in the developing neural network, as a model to elucidate the link between the mechanism of action and toxicological response. Our objective was to answer the following two questions: (1) Can the mixture models CA or IA be used to predict combined effects for neuroactive chemical mixtures when the components share a similar mode of action (i.e., hyper- or hypoactivity) but show different mechanism of action? (2) Will a mixture of chemicals where the components show opposing effect directions result in an antagonistic combined effect? Results indicate that mixture toxicity of chemicals such as propafenone and abamectin as well as chlorpyrifos and hexaconazole that are known to show different mechanisms of action but similar effect directions were predictable using CA and IA models. This could be interpreted with the convergence of effects on the neural level leading to either a collective activation or inhibition of synapses. We also found antagonistic effects for mixtures containing substances with opposing effect direction. Finally, we discuss how the STC may be used to amend risk assessment.


Author(s):  
Afolarin Olaposi Ogungbemi ◽  
Riccardo Massei ◽  
Rolf Altenburger ◽  
Stefan Scholz ◽  
Eberhard Küster

Risk assessment of chemicals is usually conducted for individual chemicals whereas mixtures of chemical are occurring in the environment. Considering that neuroactive chemicals are a group of contaminants that dominate in the environment, it is then imperative to understand the combined effects from mixtures. The commonly used models to predict mixture effects, namely concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA), are thought suitable for mixtures of similarly or dissimilarly acting components, respectively. For mixture toxicity prediction, one important challenge is to clarify whether to group neuroactive substances based on similar mechanisms of action, e.g. same molecular target or rather similar toxicological response, e.g. hyper- or hypoactivity (effect direction). We addressed this by using the spontaneous tail coiling (STC) of zebrafish embryos, which represents the earliest observable motor activity in the developing neural network, as a model to elucidate the link between mechanism of action and toxicological response. Two questions were asked: 1.) Can the mixture models CA or IA be used to predict combined effects for neuroactive chemical mixtures when the components share a similar mode of action (i.e. hyper- or hypoativity) but show different mechanism of action? 2.) Will a mixture of chemicals where the components show opposing effect directions result in an antagonistic combined effect? Results indicate that mixture toxicity of chemicals such as propafenone and abamectin as well as chlorpyrifos and hexaconazole that are known to show different mechanisms of action but similar effect directions were predictable using CA and IA models. This could be interpreted with the convergence of effects on the neural level leading to either a collective activation or inhibition of synapses. We also found antagonistic effects for mixtures containing substances with opposing effect direction. Finally, we discuss how the STC may be used to amend risk assessment.


1995 ◽  
Vol 377 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Caputo ◽  
M. Maggi ◽  
G. Masini ◽  
F. Palma ◽  
K. Vasanth ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTWe report on modeling the evolution of the spatial defect profile in the i-layer of a-Si:H solar cells combined with tests of the model against the efficiency decay of amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) p-i-n solar cells under various light-soaking conditions. We use a finite-element device simulator. The defect density during light-soaking is calculated as a function of time and of position. The defect density evolves due to the combined effects of light-induced generation, assumed proportional to the product of free carrier densities, and of light-induced annealing, assumed proportional to the sum of carrier densities. We find that in thick cells defects close to the p-i interface affect cell efficiency less than bulk defects, and that in thin cells the defect density increases significantly in the central portion of the i-layer. However, in thin cells the high electric field masks the effect of the defect density increase.


2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Dawson ◽  
T. Mooneyham ◽  
J. Jeyaratnam ◽  
T. W. Schultz ◽  
G. Pöch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document