Large-Scale Variation in Subsurface Stream Biofilms: A Cross-Regional Comparison of Metabolic Function and Community Similarity

2006 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Findlay ◽  
R. L. Sinsabaugh
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 662-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Martin ◽  
Armand Valsesia ◽  
Amalio Telenti ◽  
Ioannis Xenarios ◽  
Brian J. Stevenson

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Sutherland ◽  
Angela K. Fuller ◽  
J. Andrew Royle ◽  
Matthew P. Hare ◽  
Sean Madden

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Figaro ◽  
Ulysse Pereira ◽  
Hiram Rada ◽  
Nicolas Semenzato ◽  
Dominique Pouchoulin ◽  
...  

Background Our team previously designed and validated a new bioartificial liver (BAL) called Suppliver based on a Prismaflex™ device, including fluidized bed bioreactors hosting alginate-encapsulated hepatocytes. To ensure correct fluidization within the bioreactor, the beads need to become heavier with the addition of inert glass microspheres. Methods In this study, we assessed the impact of this additional component on the bead production process, bed fluidization, mass transfer and the mechanical properties of the beads, as well as cell viability and basic metabolic function. Results A concentration of 20 mg (1% v/v) of microspheres for 15–20 million cells per milliliter of alginate solution appears to be the best configuration. The filling ratio for the beads in the bioreactors can reach 60%. Four 250-mL bioreactors represent approximately 15% of the hepatocytes in a liver, which is a reasonable target for extracorporeal liver supply. Conclusions Increasing bead density clearly maintained the performances of the fluidized bed with plasma of different compositions, without any risk of release out of the bioreactor. A 1% (v/v)-concentration of microspheres in alginate solution did not result in any alteration of the mechanical or biological behavior. This concentration can thus be applied to the production of large-scale encapsulated biomass for further use of the Suppliver setup in human scale preclinical studies.


1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Callum M. Roberts ◽  
Alexander R. Dawson Shepherd ◽  
Rupert F. G. Ormond

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Villnäs ◽  
Judi Hewitt ◽  
Martin Snickars ◽  
Mats Westerbom ◽  
Alf Norkko

Bird Study ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-252
Author(s):  
Helgi Guðjónsson ◽  
Jón Einar Jónsson ◽  
Halldór Walter Stefánsson ◽  
Aðalsteinn Örn Snæþórsson ◽  
Tómas Grétar Gunnarsson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document