Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1771-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Schmolders ◽  
Max J. Friedrich ◽  
Robert Michel ◽  
Andreas C. Strauss ◽  
Matthias D. Wimmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Charlson Comorbidity Index ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Comorbidity Index

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

Injury to the Colon During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey S. Hagstrom ◽  
Dennis J. Callahan ◽  
James W. Green
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo García-Rey ◽  
Ricardo Fernández-Fernández ◽  
David Durán ◽  
Rosario Madero
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Rotation Center

The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. e19
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Bozic ◽  
Steven M. Kurtz ◽  
Edmund Lau ◽  
Kevin Ong ◽  
Thomas P. Vail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
The United States ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip

The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 2023-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanqing Mao ◽  
Chen Xu ◽  
Jiawei Xu ◽  
Huiwu Li ◽  
Fengxiang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document