Spatial relationships and matrilineal kinship in African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) clans

2004 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell A. Charif ◽  
Rob Roy Ramey ◽  
William R. Langbauer ◽  
Katharine B. Payne ◽  
Rowan B. Martin ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Lamglait ◽  
Antoine Joris ◽  
Aurore Romey ◽  
Labib Bakkali-Kassimi ◽  
Karin Lemberger

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce W. Clegg ◽  
Timothy G. O’Connor

As a foundation for understanding the diet of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana), adult bulls and cows were observed over an annual cycle to determine whether harvesting (Pt), chewing (Ct) and handling times (Ht) differed across food types and harvesting methods (handling time is defined as the time to harvest, chew and swallow a trunkload of food). Bulls and cows were observed 105 and 26 times, respectively (94 and 26 individuals), with a total of 64 h of feeding recorded across 32 vegetation types. Some food types took longer to harvest and chew than others, which may influence intake rate and affect choice of diet. The method used to gather a trunkload of food had a significant effect on harvesting time, with simple foraging actions being comparatively rapid and more difficult tasks taking longer. Handling time was constrained by chewing for bulls, except for the processing of roots from woody plants, which was limited by harvesting. Time to gather a trunkload had a greater influence on handling time for cows compared to bulls. Harvesting and handling times were longer for bulls than cows, with the sexes adopting foraging behaviors that best suited their energy requirements.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 11069-11089
Author(s):  
George G. Lohay ◽  
Thomas Casey Weathers ◽  
Anna B. Estes ◽  
Barbara C. McGrath ◽  
Douglas R. Cavener

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Njaramba Ngatia ◽  
Tian Ming Lan ◽  
Yue Ma ◽  
Thi Dao Dinh ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
...  

AbstractTrade in ivory from extant elephant species namely Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) is regulated internationally, while the trade in ivory from extinct species of Elephantidae, including woolly mammoth, is unregulated. This distinction creates opportunity for laundering and trading elephant ivory as mammoth ivory. The existing morphological and molecular genetics methods do not reliably distinguish the source of ivory items that lack clear identification characteristics or for which the quality of extracted DNA cannot support amplification of large gene fragments. We present a PCR-sequencing method based on 116 bp target sequence of the cytochrome b gene to specifically amplify elephantid DNA while simultaneously excluding non-elephantid species and ivory substitutes, and while avoiding contamination by human DNA. The partial Cytochrome b gene sequence enabled accurate association of ivory samples with their species of origin for all three extant elephants and from mammoth. The detection limit of the PCR system was as low as 10 copy numbers of target DNA. The amplification and sequencing success reached 96.7% for woolly mammoth ivory and 100% for African savanna elephant and African forest elephant ivory. This is the first validated method for distinguishing elephant from mammoth ivory and it provides forensic support for investigation of ivory laundering cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document