Bird Use of Restoration and Reference Marshes Within the Barn Island Wildlife Management Area, Stonington, Connecticut, USA

1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hunter Brawley ◽  
R. Scott Warren ◽  
Robert A. Askins
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Management Area

Co-orientation of State Wildlife Agency Personnel and Wildlife Management Area Stakeholders Regarding Wildlife Habitat Management Activities in Virginia

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Carrozzino-Lyon ◽  
Steve L. McMullin ◽  
James A. Parkhurst
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Habitat Management ◽  
Wildlife Habitat ◽  
Management Area

The Vascular Flora of Mason Mountain Wildlife Management Area, Mason County, Texas

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 683-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Singhurst ◽  
Laura L. Sanchez ◽  
Donnie Frels ◽  
T. Wayne Schwertner ◽  
Mark Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Vascular Flora ◽  
Management Area ◽  
Mason County

Vascular Flora of Hugo Lake Wildlife Management Area, Choctaw County, Oklahoma

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce W. Hoagland ◽  
Amy K. Buthod
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Vascular Flora ◽  
Management Area

Summer Flora of the Gene Howe Wildlife Management Area, Hemphill County, Texas

1957 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Chester M. Rowell
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Management Area

THE VASCULAR FLORA OF GUS ENGELING WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Singhurst ◽  
James C. Cathy ◽  
Dale Prochaska ◽  
Hayden Haucke ◽  
Glenn C. Kroh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Vascular Flora ◽  
Management Area

Patterns of behavior in the Texas tortoise, Gopherus berlandieri: a multivariate ordination approach

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1363-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T Kazmaier ◽  
Eric C Hellgren ◽  
David R Synatzske
Keyword(s):  
Correspondence Analysis ◽  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Environmental Variables ◽  
Detrended Correspondence Analysis ◽  
Behavioral Variability ◽  
Significant Variable ◽  
Active Behavior ◽  
Management Area ◽  
Dry Conditions ◽  
Patterns Of Behavior

We compared the distribution of 19 categories of behavior exhibited by 47 adult Texas tortoises (Gopherus berlandieri) over 3 years with the use of detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). DCA revealed a gradient from passive to active behavior along axis 1. Tortoises were more active in 1994 and less active in 1996. This pattern was likely due to the extremely hot and dry conditions in 1996. Year was the most significant variable explaining variability in behavior when sex, age, size, year, and grazing treatment (pastures grazed versus ungrazed by cattle) were used as environmental variables in CCA. Age, size, and grazing treatment were not significant variables in CCA. Tortoises used proportionally more burrows, shallow surface depressions termed pallets, and cavity pallets, and ate more cactus in 1996. More foraging and active behaviors, like courtship, were observed in 1994. Sex was a significant variable in explaining behavioral variability after the effects of year were controlled for. Males tended to exhibit more active behaviors than females. Our analyses suggested that the grazing regime used in Chaparral Wildlife Management Area did not affect the patterns of behavior exhibited by this protected tortoise.

Amphibians and Reptiles of the Black Gap Wildlife Management Area, Brewster County, Texas

1959 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph W. Axtell
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Management Area
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document