FDG-PET in the Erdheim–Chester disease: its diagnostic and follow-up role

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emőke Šteňová ◽  
Boris Šteňo ◽  
Pavol Povinec ◽  
František Ondriaš ◽  
Jana Rampalová
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikchan Jeon ◽  
Joon Hyuk Choi

Abstract Background Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, idiopathic, systemic non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis involving long bone and visceral organs. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is uncommon and most cases develop as a part of systemic disease. We present a rare case of variant ECD as an isolated intramedullary tumor. Case presentation A 75-year-old female patient with a medical history of diabetes and hypertension presented with sudden-onset flaccid paraparesis for 1 day. Neurological examination revealed grade 2–3 weakness in both legs, decreased deep tendon reflex, loss of anal tone, and numbness below T4. Leg weakness deteriorated to G1 before surgery. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) showed an intramedullary mass lesion at T2-T4 with no systemic lesion, which was heterogeneous enhancement pattern with cord swelling and edema from C7 to T6. Gross total removal was achieved for the white-gray-colored and soft-natured intramedullary mass lesion with an ill-defined boundary. Histological finding revealed benign histiocytic proliferation with foamy histiocytes and uniform nuclei. We concluded it as an isolated intramedullary ECD. The patient showed self-standing and walkable at 18-month with no evidence of recurrence and new lesion on spine MRI and whole-body FDG-PET/CT until sudden occurrence of unknown originated thoracic cord infarction. Conclusions We experienced an extremely rare case of isolated intramedullary ECD, which was controlled by surgical resection with no adjuvant therapy. Histological examination is the most important for final diagnosis, and careful serial follow-up after surgical resection is required to identify the recurrence and progression to systemic disease.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Antonio Adolfo Guerra Soares Brandão ◽  
Giancarlo Fatobene ◽  
Andre Abdo ◽  
Luis Alberto de Padua Covas Lage ◽  
Israel Bendit ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm with a heterogenous clinical course with asymptomatic localized course or systemic compromise involving multiples organs causing significant morbidity and mortality. There are few cohorts published however mainly from North America and Europe. Given the scarcity of data on ECD in Latin America, we have established a local registry in the city of São Paulo to collect clinical and biological material of ECD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on biopsy-proven ECD patients diagnosed and treated at two reference centers for histiocytic disorders (Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo e Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brazil) from January 2006 to February 2020. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with confirmed diagnosis of ECD were included with median age of 53 years. 75% were males and a median follow-up time of 50 months (7-163). Median time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 13 months (0.1-142). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) findings showed positivity for CD68 in 15/16 (94%) and for S100 in 3/16 (19%) patients, no case had CD1a positivity. The most frequent organs involved were: bone (75%), skin (44%), central nervous system (CNS) (44%), lymph nodes (31%), lung (13%), liver (6%), spleen (6%), and gastrointestinal tract (6%) of cases. CNS lesions involvement occurred mostly in the pituitary gland (86%). Twelve of 16 (75%) patients presented disease in more than one organ. Xanthelasma and xanthoma were the most common skin lesions (44%). The most frequent histiocytosis-related clinical manifestations were bone pain (44%) and diabetes insipidus (38%). The most frequent radiologic findings were osteosclerosis in 12/16 (75%) patients, retroperitoneal fibrosis around the kidneys in 6/16 (38%), the coated aorta sign and orbital infiltration were found in 4/16 (25%) of cases. 18FDG/PET-CT was performed in all patients, of whom 13 (81%) had hypermetabolic lesions. BRAF status at diagnosis was available in 13/16 patients using the technique of Sanger in 5/13, pyrosequencing in 3/13, IHC in 3/13 and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 2/13. Mutations were detected in only 3/16 (19%) cases. All patients received treatment due to symptomatic disease with a median of two lines of therapy (1-7). Median time between diagnosis and the first treatment was one month. First-line treatments were interferon in 12/16 patients, steroids in 5/16, and each one of thalidomide, vemurafenib and tumoral resection in one patient. Beyond first-line therapy, the most conventional chemotherapy regimens used were cladribine (4/16 patients) and LCH-like etoposide-containing vinblastine, methotrexate and mercaptopurine (2/16 patients). Other treatments included radiotherapy (4/16 patients) and a single patient used cobimetinib, imatinib and infliximab. Median progression free survival (PFS) after the first line treatment was 7.5 months (95% CI 5-10), and median overall survival (OS) was not reached to this date. Time to next treatment was 9 months in patients who did not achieved at least partial response after first line, and 15 months in those who attained it. PFS at 2 years was 45% (95% CI 0.17-0.71), and OS at 2 years was 100%. One patient died due to infection complication after the first cycle of cladribine after 50 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, despite the low number of patients, this is the largest Latin American cohort of patients with ECD reported to date. Our findings resemble demographic characteristics, sites of involvement and treatment choices reported by other groups. However, it is noteworthy that the proportion of ECD patients bearing a BRAF mutation (18.8%) was pretty lower than previously reported (approximately 50%). This needs to be taken cautiously due to the small number of subjects and due to technical issues, since all samples analyzed by PCR or Sanger were negative for BRAF mutation. A national registry of histiocytosis is needed to confirm these preliminary data. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Vaios Hatzoglou ◽  
Justin B. Buthorn ◽  
Dana Bossert ◽  
Allison M. Sigler ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to [1] characterize distribution of Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) by 18F-FDG PET/CT and [2] determine the utility of metabolic (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging versus anatomic imaging (CT or MRI) in evaluating ECD patients for clinical trial eligibility. Methods 18F-FDG PET/CT and corresponding CT or MRI studies for ECD patients enrolled in a prospective registry study were reviewed. Sites of disease were classified as [1] detectable by 18F-FDG PET only, CT/MRI only, or both and as [2] measurable by modified PERCIST (mPERCIST) only, RECIST only, or both. Descriptive analysis was performed and paired t test for between-group comparisons. Results Fifty patients were included (mean age 51.5 years; range 18–70 years). Three hundred thirty-three disease sites were detected among all imaging modalities, 188 (56%) by both 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI, 67 (20%) by 18F-FDG PET only, 75 (23%) by MRI brain only, and 3 (1%) by CT only. Of 178 disease sites measurable by mPERCIST or RECIST, 40 (22%) were measurable by both criteria, 136 (76%) by mPERCIST only, and 2 (1%) by RECIST only. On the patient level, 17 (34%) had mPERCIST and RECIST measurable disease, 30 (60%) had mPERCIST measurable disease only, and 0 had RECIST measurable disease only (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Compared with anatomic imaging, 18F-FDG PET/CT augments evaluation of disease extent in ECD and increases identification of disease sites measurable by formal response criteria and therefore eligibility for clinical trials. Complementary organ-specific anatomic imaging offers the capacity to characterize sites of disease in greater anatomic detail. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03329274


2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Sabino ◽  
Romulo Hermeto Bueno do Vale ◽  
Paulo Schiavom Duarte ◽  
Marcelo Tatit Sapienza ◽  
Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 774-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Young ◽  
Geoffrey B. Johnson ◽  
Robert C. Murphy ◽  
Ronald S. Go ◽  
Stephen M. Broski

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrissa Sioka ◽  
Juvianee Estrada-Veras ◽  
Irinia Maric ◽  
William A. Gahl ◽  
Clara C. Chen

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Ambrosini ◽  
Francesco Savelli ◽  
Elisa Merli ◽  
Maurizio Zompatori ◽  
Cristina Nanni ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Sandrock ◽  
Maria J. Merino ◽  
Beate H. B. Scheffknecht ◽  
Ronald D. Neumann

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 337-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esma A. Akin ◽  
Murat Osman ◽  
Amy L. Ellenbogen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document