scholarly journals Performance of a new natural oral contrast agent (LumiVision®) in dynamic MR swallowing

Author(s):  
Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini ◽  
Michael A. Arnoldner ◽  
Wolfgang Schima ◽  
Ivan Kristo ◽  
Sebastian F. Schoppmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To evaluate image quality by first use of LumiVision® in dynamic MR swallowing, a contrast medium consisting of biological substances versus a gadolinium-buttermilk mixture in patients who underwent Nissen fundoplication due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods The protocol of this retrospective study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. A hundred twenty-nine patients (146 examinations) underwent a dynamic MR swallowing study (at 1.5 T or 3.0 T) and received an oral contrast agent. Two readers evaluated the distention of the esophagus, contrast, and traceability of the bolus in a 3-point scale. A steady-state coherent sequence (B-FFE, TrueFISP) was used. The patients were divided into 3 different groups: 53 patients received gadolinium chelate (Dotarem®)–buttermilk mixture (GBM) in a dilution of 1:40 as an oral contrast agent; 44 patients received LumiVision® water mixture (LWM) in a dilution of 1:1 and 49 patients received LumiVision® (L) undiluted. Results GBM showed significantly better results in overall evaluation for both readers in contrast to LWM (p = .003, p = .002). L also reached significantly better results in overall evaluation than LWM in both readers (p = .004, p = .042). There was no significant difference in the overall evaluation between L and GBM (p = .914, p = .376).According to Landis and Koch, interobserver agreement was “substantial” (Cohen’s kappa = 0.738) between both readers. Conclusion LumiVision® undiluted showed equal image quality compared to gadolinium-buttermilk mixture. The constellation of LumiVision® water mixture led to a clearly negative result in relation to the image quality compared to LumiVision® undiluted. Therefore, oral ingestion of LumiVision® undiluted is recommended for MR swallowing examinations. Key Points • LumiVision® undiluted shows significantly better image quality in comparison to LumiVision® diluted in oral application in swallowing MRI. • LumiVision® undiluted shows equal image quality in comparison to gadolinium-buttermilk mixture in oral application. • Oral ingestion of LumiVision® undiluted can replace gadolinium-buttermilk mixture in oral MR examinations.

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 721
Author(s):  
Hyo Sung Kwak ◽  
Jeong Min Lee ◽  
Doo Hyun Yang ◽  
In Whan Kim ◽  
Chong Soo Kim ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 149 (5) ◽  
pp. 1084-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Angelelli ◽  
L Macarini ◽  
A Fratello

1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 699
Author(s):  
Hak Won Cho ◽  
Hee Suk Lee ◽  
An Lee Lim ◽  
Seung Hyeun Kim ◽  
Shin Hyung Lee ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Harisinghani ◽  
S. Saini ◽  
W. Schima ◽  
M. McNicholas ◽  
P.R. Mueller

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. S355-S356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Laghi ◽  
Iacopo Carbone ◽  
Pasquale Paolantonio ◽  
Riccardo Iannaccone ◽  
Roberto Passariello

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document