Roughness effects on turbulent plane wall jets in an open channel

2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Tachie ◽  
R. Balachandar ◽  
D. J. Bergstrom
2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tachie ◽  
R. Balachandar ◽  
D. Bergstrom

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayhaneh Banyassady ◽  
Ugo Piomelli

2021 ◽  
pp. 108174
Author(s):  
J.-H. Thysen ◽  
T. van Hooff ◽  
B. Blocken ◽  
G.J.F. van Heijst
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gerodimos ◽  
R. M. C. So

In most two-dimensional simple turbulent flows, the location of zero shear usually coincides with that of vanishing mean velocity gradient. However, such is not the case for plane turbulent wall jets. This could be due to the fact that the driving potential is the jet exit momentum, which gives rise to an outer region that resembles a free jet and an inner layer that is similar to a boundary layer. The interaction of a free-jet like flow with a boundary-layer type flow distinguishes the plane wall jet from other simple flows. Consequently, in the past, two-equation turbulence models are seldom able to predict the jet spread correctly. The present study investigates the appropriateness of two-equation modeling; particularly the importance of near-wall modeling and the validity of the equilibrium turbulence assumption. An improved near-wall model and three others are analyzed and their predictions are compared with recent measurements of plane wall jets. The jet spread is calculated correctly by the improved model, which is able to replicate the mixing behavior between the outer jet-like and inner wall layer and is asymptotically consistent. Good agreement with other measured quantities is also obtained. However, other near-wall models tested are also capable of reproducing the Reynolds-number effects of plane wall jets, but their predictions of the jet spread are incorrect.


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark F. Tachie ◽  
Donald J. Bergstrom ◽  
Ram Balachandar

This paper investigates the effects of surface roughness on the transport and mixing properties in turbulent boundary layers created in an open channel. The measurements were obtained on a smooth and two different types of rough surfaces using a laser Doppler anemometer. The results show that surface roughness enhances the levels of the turbulence kinetic energy, turbulence production, and diffusion over most of the boundary layer. The distributions of the eddy viscosity and mixing length are also strongly modified by surface roughness. Furthermore, the extent to which surface roughness modifies the turbulence structure depends on the specific geometry of the roughness elements.


2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 935-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamel Kechiche ◽  
Hatem Mhiri ◽  
Georges Le Palec ◽  
Philippe Bournot

AIAA Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 1217-1229
Author(s):  
T. Sarpkaya ◽  
C. F. Merrill
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document