CFD simulations of two opposing plane wall jets in a generic empty airplane cabin: Comparison of RANS and LES

2021 ◽  
pp. 108174
Author(s):  
J.-H. Thysen ◽  
T. van Hooff ◽  
B. Blocken ◽  
G.J.F. van Heijst
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tachie ◽  
R. Balachandar ◽  
D. Bergstrom

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gerodimos ◽  
R. M. C. So

In most two-dimensional simple turbulent flows, the location of zero shear usually coincides with that of vanishing mean velocity gradient. However, such is not the case for plane turbulent wall jets. This could be due to the fact that the driving potential is the jet exit momentum, which gives rise to an outer region that resembles a free jet and an inner layer that is similar to a boundary layer. The interaction of a free-jet like flow with a boundary-layer type flow distinguishes the plane wall jet from other simple flows. Consequently, in the past, two-equation turbulence models are seldom able to predict the jet spread correctly. The present study investigates the appropriateness of two-equation modeling; particularly the importance of near-wall modeling and the validity of the equilibrium turbulence assumption. An improved near-wall model and three others are analyzed and their predictions are compared with recent measurements of plane wall jets. The jet spread is calculated correctly by the improved model, which is able to replicate the mixing behavior between the outer jet-like and inner wall layer and is asymptotically consistent. Good agreement with other measured quantities is also obtained. However, other near-wall models tested are also capable of reproducing the Reynolds-number effects of plane wall jets, but their predictions of the jet spread are incorrect.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhasish Dey ◽  
Tushar K. Nath ◽  
Sujit K. Bose
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 1061-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nallamuthu Rajaratnam ◽  
Roger K. Macdougall
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayhaneh Banyassady ◽  
Ugo Piomelli

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Yongli Zhong ◽  
Zhitao Yan ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Jie Luo ◽  
Hua Zhang

Turbulent radial and plane wall jets have been extensively investigated both experimentally and numerically over the past few decades. Previous studies mostly focused on the heat and mass transfers involved in jet flows. In this study, a comprehensive investigation was conducted on turbulent radial and plane wall jets, considering both jet spread and velocity decay for different parameters. The numerical results were compared with existing experimental measurements. The comparison focused on the velocity profile, jet spread, and velocity decay, and revealed that the Reynolds stress model (RSM) performs well in the simulation of both radial and plane wall jets. The results show that with a typical ratio of cloud base height to diameter for most downburst events, the effects of nozzle height and Reynolds number on the evolution of the radial wall jet are not significant. Both the jet spread and velocity decay exhibit a clear dependence on the Reynolds number below a critical value. Above this critical value, the plane wall jet becomes asymptotically independent of the Reynolds number. The co-flow was found to have a significant influence on the evolution of the plane wall jet. Comparatively, the jet spread and velocity of the radial wall jet were faster than those of the plane jet. For applications in civil engineering, it is valid to approximate the downburst outflow with a two-dimensional (2D) assumption from the perspective of longitudinal evolution of the flows.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Tachie ◽  
R. Balachandar ◽  
D. J. Bergstrom

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document