scholarly journals Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology)

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan Azman Wan Ahmad ◽  
Takaharu Nakayoshi ◽  
Ahmad Syadi Mahmood Zuhdi ◽  
Muhammad Dzafir Ismail ◽  
Imran Zainal Abidin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Coronary Vessels ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Bioabsorbable Polymer ◽  
Neointimal Thickness ◽  
Yellow Plaque ◽  
Coronary Angioscopy ◽  
Vascular Scaffolds ◽  
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Abstract Recent clinical trials have raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of ABSORB™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). The difference in the vascular healing process between SYNERGY™ bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BVS remains unclear. The aim of the ENHANCE study was to compare vascular healing on BP-EES versus BVS by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) at 4- and 12-month follow-ups. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single center clinical trial. Thirteen eligible patients with multivessel disease were enrolled. BP-EES and BVS were simultaneously implanted in the same patients, but in different coronary vessels. Imaging follow-up with both OCT and CAS was completed in 11 patients at 12 months. Neointimal coverage rates were similar between the two groups based on OCT measurements. The neointimal thickness of BP-EES was significantly thicker at the 12th month than at the 4th month, whereas the neointimal thickness of BVS did not change between the measurements taken at the 4th and 12th month. Existence of intra-stent thrombus was significantly higher in the BVS group, compared to the BP-EES group. On the other hand, CAS revealed that red-thrombi and yellow-plaque were more frequently observed in BVS at 4 months and up to 12-month follow-ups than in BP-EES. These findings suggested that the evidence of instability remained up to 12 months in the vascular healing with BVS, compared to that with BP-EES. Vascular healing of the stented wall was recognized at the very early phase after BP-EES implantation. However, vascular healing with BVS was still incomplete after 12 months.

Optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy assessment of healed vulnerable plaque components in patients with coronary artery lesions undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kimura ◽  
K Hara ◽  
M Ohmori ◽  
R Tateishi ◽  
T Kaneda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Vulnerable Plaque ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Coronary Artery Lesions ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Yellow Plaque ◽  
Coronary Angioscopy

Abstract Background Many vulnerable plaques would progress without clinical events and might result in healed plaques (HPs). Histopathological or intracoronary image assessment of HPs has been reported. However, the morphological characteristics of HPs remain unclear yet. Purpose We sought to assess the healed vulnerable plaque components in patients with coronary artery lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS). Methods We enrolled 47 patients with 50 native coronary artery lesions with angiographical severe stenosis (>90% diameter-stenosis) and without severe calcification (36 lesions with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and 14 acute coronary syndrome (ACS)) undergoing pre-intervention OCT and CAS. HPs was defined as layered phenotype on OCT. Lesion morphologies and plaque characteristics in lesions with HPs were assessed using OCT and CAS images. Results HPs were observed in 27 lesions (54.0%) and their prevalence were similar among each clinical status (SAP 52.8%, ACS 57.1%, p=1.00). Lesions with HPs had higher prevalence of OCT-macrophage (88.0% vs. 52.0%, p=0.01), CAS-red thrombus (88.8% vs. 52.2%, p=0.004) and CAS-low grade-yellow plaque (grade 1) (55.6% vs. 21.7%, p=0.02) than those without. SAP lesions with HPs had higher prevalence of CAS-yellow plaque (35.3% vs. 5.9%, p=0.09) and OCT-thin-cap fibroatheroma (42.1% vs. 5.9%, p=0.04) than SAP without HPs. ACS lesions with HPs had less CAS-red thrombus (0.0% vs. 50.0%, p=0.03) and OCT-plaque rupture (12.5% vs. 66.7%, p=0.04) than ACS without HPs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that OCT-macrophages (odds ratio (OR): 6.65, 95%-confidence intervals: 1.07–41.5, p=0.043), CAS-red thrombus (OR 8.77, 95% CI 1.33–57.8, p=0.02), and low grade-yellow plaque (OR 13.05, 95% CI 1.97–86.5, p=0.008) were independently related with the existence of HPs lesions. Combination of these 3 factors showed a high predictive value of OCT-HPs lesions (90.9%). Conclusions HPs lesions showed the lower lesion vulnerability than common ACS lesions but had more intraplaque inflammatory condition compared with common SAP lesions. Combined CAS and OCT examination might be useful to clarify the plaque components of HPs lesions in vivo, leading to help us understand the clinical significance of HPs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document