Rescue valve-in-valve implantations in second generation transapical transcatheter aortic valve prostheses

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Van Linden ◽  
Johannes Blumenstein ◽  
Thomas Walther ◽  
Helge Möllmann ◽  
Won Keun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve In Valve ◽  
Valve Prostheses

A valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation with commissural alignment using advanced imaging reconstruction: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Marco Angelillis
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Structural Valve Deterioration ◽  
Valve In Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Valve ◽  
Valve Implantation

Transcatheter valve in valve (ViV) implantation actually represents a valid alternative to surgical reinterventions in patients with previous surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). In patients less than 80 years old, it is crucial to correctly position the new valve leaving a feasible and easy access to coronary ostia, both for future percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than for a future possible TAVinTAV procedure. We report a 71 year old man with prior AVR presented with structural valve deterioration (SVD) leading to severe aortic stenosis. In order to guarantee comfortable coronary access we aligned, the commissures of the new percutaneous valve with the ones of the surgical bioprothesis by reconstructing the headframes of the surgical bioprosthesis with computer tomography (CT) and fluoro-CT.

scholarly journals Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation with fracturing of a failed small surgical aortic bioprosthesis: a case report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaz Bunc ◽  
Miha Cercek ◽  
Tomaz Podlesnikar ◽  
Simon Terseglav ◽  
Klemen Steblovnik
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Bioprosthetic Valve ◽  
Heart Team ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Patient Prosthesis Mismatch ◽  
Valve In Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Background Failure of a small surgical aortic bioprosthesis represents a challenging clinical scenario with valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) often resulting in patient-prosthesis mismatch. Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) performed as a part of the ViV TAVI has recently emerged as an alternative approach with certain types of surgical bioprostheses. Case summary An 81-year-old woman with a history of three surgical aortic valve procedures presented with heart failure. Aortic bioprosthesis degeneration with severe stenosis and moderate regurgitation was found. The patient was deemed a high-risk surgical candidate and the heart team decided that ViV TAVI was the preferred treatment option. Due to the very small 19 mm stented surgical aortic bioprosthesis Mitroflow 19 mm (Sorin Group, Italy) we decided to perform BVF as a part of ViV TAVI to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch. Since this was the first BVF procedure in our centre, an ex vivo BVF of the same kind of bioprosthetic valve was performed first. Subsequently, successful BVF with implantation of Evolut R 23 mm (Medtronic, USA) self-expandable transcatheter valve was performed. Excellent haemodynamic result was achieved and no periprocedural complications were present. The patient had an immediate major improvement in clinical status and remains asymptomatic after 6 months. Discussion Bioprosthetic valve fracture together with ViV TAVI is a safe and effective emerging technique for treatment of small surgical aortic bioprosthesis failure. Bioprosthetic valve fracture allows marked oversizing of implanted self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves, leading to excellent haemodynamic and clinical results. An ex vivo BVF can serve as an important preparatory step when introducing the new method.

scholarly journals Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Pompeu B.O. Sá ◽  
Jef Van den Eynde ◽  
Matheus Simonato ◽  
Luiz Rafael P. Cavalcanti ◽  
Ilias P. Doulamis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve In Valve

scholarly journals More in, better out? Successful valve-in-valve procedure of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Dieter Hönemann ◽  
Steffen Hofmann ◽  
Frank Ritter ◽  
Gerold Mönnig
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ventricular Septal Defect ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Heart Team ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve In Valve

Abstract Background A rare, but serious, complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the occurrence of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect (VSD). Case summary We describe a case of an 80-year-old female who was referred with severe aortic stenosis for TAVR. Following thorough evaluation, the heart team consensus was to proceed with implantation via a transapical approach of an ACURATE neo M 25 mm valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The valve was deployed harnessing transoesophageal echocardiographic (TOE) guidance under rapid pacing with post-dilation. Directly afterwards a very high VSD close to the aortic annulus was detected. As the patient was haemodynamically stable, the procedure was ended. The next day another TOE revealed a shunt volume (left-to-right ventricle) between 50% and 60%. Because the defect was partly located between the stent struts of the ACURATE valve decision was made to fix this leakage with implantation of a further valve and we chose an EVOLUT Pro 29 mm (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The valve-in-valve was implanted 2–3 mm below the lower edge of the first valve, more towards the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with excellent result: VSD was reduced to a very small residual shunt without any hemodynamic relevance. Discussion We suggest that an iatrogenic VSD located near the annulus may be treated percutaneously in a bail-out situation with implantation of a second valve that should be implanted slightly more into the LVOT to cover the VSD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document