scholarly journals A comparison of procedural success rate and long-term clinical outcomes between in-stent restenosis chronic total occlusion and de novo chronic total occlusion using multicenter registry data

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hun Lee ◽  
Jae Young Cho ◽  
Je Sang Kim ◽  
Hyun Jong Lee ◽  
Jeong Hoon Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There have been little data about outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the drug eluting stent (DES) era. This study aimed to compare the procedural success rate and long-term clinical outcomes of ISR CTO and de novo CTO. Methods and results Patients who underwent PCI for ISR CTO (n = 164) versus de novo CTO (n = 1208) were enrolled from three centers in Korea between January 2008 and December 2014. Among a total of ISR CTO, a proportion of DES ISR CTO was 79.3% (n = 130). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs); a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Following propensity score-matching (1:3), the ISR CTO group (n = 156) had a higher success rate (84.6% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.035), mainly driven by high success rate of PCI for DES ISR CTO (88.6%), but showed a higher incidence of MACEs [hazard ratio (HR): 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37–3.09; p < 0.001], mainly driven by higher prevalence of MI [HR: 9.71; 95% CI 2.06–45.81; p = 0.004] and TLR [HR: 3.04; 95% CI 1.59–5.81; p = 0.001], during 5 years of follow-up after successful revascularization, as compared to the de novo CTO group (n = 408). Conclusion The procedural success rate was higher in the ISR CTO than the de novo CTO, especially in DES ISR CTO. However, irrespective of successful revascularization, the long-term clinical outcomes for the ISR CTO were significantly worse than those for the de novo CTO, in terms of MI and TLR. Graphic abstract

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 440
Author(s):  
Wei-Chieh Lee ◽  
Po-Jui Wu ◽  
Chih-Yuan Fang ◽  
Huang-Chung Chen ◽  
Chiung-Jen Wu ◽  
...  

Objectives: To examine the impact of revascularization and associated clinical outcomes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) chronic total occlusion (CTO) and non-CKD CTO groups. Background: The influence of CKD on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO lesions is unknown, and there is no systemic review of this topic to date. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ClinicalKey, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials Databases for articles published between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2020. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Data included demographics, lesion distributions, incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), acute kidney injury (AKI), procedural success rate, mortality, and target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Six studies were ultimately included in this systematic review. A high prevalence (25.5%; range, 19.6–37.9%) of CKD was noted in the CTO population. In the non-CKD group, outcomes were better: less incidence of CIN or AKI (odds ratio (OR), 2.860; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.775–4.608), higher procedural success rate (OR, 1.382; 95% CI, 1.036–1.843), and lower long-term mortality (OR, 4.502; 95% CI, 3.561–5.693). The incidence of TLR/TVR (OR, 1.118; 95% CI, 0.888–1.407) did not differ between groups. Conclusions: In the CKD CTO PCI population, a lower procedural success rate, a higher incidence of CIN or AKI, and higher in-hospital and long-term mortality rate were noted due to more complex lesions and more comorbidities. However, the incidence of TLR/TVR did not differ between groups.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orhan Dogdu ◽  
Mikail Yarlioglues ◽  
Mehmet G. Kaya ◽  
Erol Tulumen ◽  
Bahadir Sarli ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 550-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHAN GAO ◽  
BO XU ◽  
YUE-JIN YANG ◽  
JIN-QING YUAN ◽  
JUE CHEN ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (17) ◽  
pp. B129
Author(s):  
Alejandro Alcocer Chauvet ◽  
Ralf Blank ◽  
Attila Dirkali ◽  
Sagar Doshi ◽  
Andrejs Erglis ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 889-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Ishihara ◽  
Mitsuyoshi Takahara ◽  
Osamu Iida ◽  
Yoshimitsu Soga ◽  
Keisuke Hirano ◽  
...  

Purpose: To report midterm outcomes after subintimal vs intraluminal drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for femoropopliteal (FP) chronic total occlusion (CTO). Methods: This subanalysis of the prospective, multicenter ZEPHYR study (ZilvEr PTX for tHe Femoral ArterY and Proximal Popliteal ArteRy) included 176 patients (mean age 74±8 years; 130 men) with 192 de novo FP CTOs that were evaluated by intravascular ultrasound after successful guidewire crossing. The primary outcome was the 2-year restenosis rate after subintimal (n=73) or intraluminal (n=119) DES implantation. Propensity score matching extracted 61 matched pairs (mean age 75 years; 49 men) for patency analysis to minimize baseline intergroup differences. Restenosis rates are reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The 1-year restenosis rates in the groups with subintimal and intraluminal DES implantation were 45% (95% CI 32% to 59%) and 35% (95% CI 22% to 49%), respectively (p=0.352), whereas the corresponding rates at 2 years were not significantly different (p=0.648) at 56% (95% CI 41% to 71%) and 51% (95% CI 34% to 68%). Baseline characteristics had no significant interaction effect on the association of subintimal angioplasty with restenosis risk. Conclusion: In FP CTO, 2-year restenosis rates were comparable after subintimal or intraluminal DES implantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document