Vestibular evoked myogenic potential in vestibular neuritis

2011 ◽  
Vol 268 (11) ◽  
pp. 1671-1677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Nola ◽  
Luca Guastini ◽  
Barbara Crippa ◽  
Marco Deiana ◽  
Renzo Mora ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (7) ◽  
pp. 683-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Manzari ◽  
A M Burgess ◽  
I S Curthoys

AbstractBackground and aims:Previous evidence shows that the n10 component of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential indicates utricular function, while the p13 component of the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential indicates saccular function. This study aimed to assess the possibility of differential utricular and saccular function testing in the clinic, and whether loss of saccular function affects utricular response.Methods:Following vibration conduction from the mid-forehead at the hairline, the ocular n10 component was recorded by surface electromyograph electrodes beneath both eyes, while the cervical p13–n23 component was recorded by surface electrodes over the tensed sternocleidomastoid muscles.Results:Fifty-nine patients were diagnosed with probable inferior vestibular neuritis, as their cervical p13–n23 component was asymmetrical (i.e. reduced or absent on the ipsilesional side), while their ocular n10 component was symmetrical (i.e. normal beneath the contralesional eye).Conclusion:The sense organ responsible for the cervical and the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials cannot be the same, as one response was normal while the other was not. Reduced or absent saccular function has no detectable effect on the ocular n10 component. On vibration stimulation, the ocular n10 component indicates utricular function and the cervical p13–n23 component indicates saccular function.


2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 477-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Zhang ◽  
Z Fan ◽  
Y Han ◽  
G Yu ◽  
H Wang

AbstractObjective:To report eight cases of inferior vestibular neuritis, in order to raise awareness of this new subtype of vestibular neuritis.Materials and methods:We retrospectively analysed 216 patients (104 males and 112 females; age range 10–64 years; mean age 38.4 years) with full clinical documentation who had attended our hospital's vertigo clinic between May 2007 and December 2008. All patients underwent systematic investigation, including hearing tests, radiology, caloric testing and vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing.Results:Of 216 patients with vestibular neuritis, eight cases were diagnosed as inferior vestibular neuritis, based on comprehensive analysis of test data. The clinical features of these eight patients were consistent with the characteristics of vestibular neuritis. The results of pure tone audiometry and caloric testing were normal, and the possibility of central lesions was excluded by cerebral computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging on admission. Six cases had unilateral loss of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, whereas two had a unilateral lower amplitude of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.Conclusions:Inferior vestibular neuritis is a novel subtype of vestibular neuritis, which involves the inferior vestibular nerve alone. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing is a useful aid to the diagnosis of inferior vestibular neuritis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document