scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in Japanese subjects: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (J-PURE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 267 (7) ◽  
pp. 2029-2041
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa Masakado ◽  
◽  
Masahiro Abo ◽  
Kunitsugu Kondo ◽  
Satoru Saeki ◽  
...  
Toxicon ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. S30
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Gracies ◽  
Thierry Lejeune ◽  
Francois Boyer ◽  
Serdar Kocer ◽  
Philippe Marque ◽  
...  

PM&R ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. S159-S159
Author(s):  
Atul T. Patel ◽  
Carolyn Geis ◽  
Katharine E. Alter ◽  
Grace Pan ◽  
Adele J. Thorpe ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul T Patel ◽  
Carolyn Geis ◽  
Katharine Alter ◽  
Grace Pan ◽  
Adele Thorpe ◽  
...  

Introduction: OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) is approved for treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity (PSULS) at a maximum dose of 400U across elbow, wrist, and finger sites. Safety and efficacy of a higher dose for PSULS were evaluated in elbow and shoulder sites not previously assessed. Methods: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated a single treatment of onabotA 300U (150U: elbow flexors; 150U: shoulder adductors) or 500U (250U; 250U) vs placebo in adults with PSULS (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS] score ≥3). Safety and efficacy were assessed at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. The study was terminated early for administrative reasons. Results: All 53 enrolled patients completed the study. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except the onabotA 500U group had more men. Most patients were Caucasian and had a cerebral ischemic stroke of moderate severity (mean=101.7 months before enrollment). Mean change from baseline in elbow MAS for onabotA 500U was significantly greater than placebo at all time points (300U at wks 2 and 4, Figure 1) . Significant tone reductions were also observed in the shoulder adductors with 500U (wks 2 and 4). The proportion of treatment responders (≥1-grade reduction in elbow MAS) was numerically greater for onabotA 500U and 300U than placebo at all time points (300U significant [ P <0.05] at wks 2, 4, and 8). CGI generally improved more with onabotA than placebo (not significant). AEs were typically mild/moderate, not related to treatment, and occurred in a similar proportion of both onabotA dose groups and a greater proportion of the placebo group (300U, 27.8%; 500U, 29.4%; placebo, 50%). Conclusions: Preliminary results from this randomized trial investigating the safety and efficacy of higher-dose onabotA for elbow and shoulder spasticity indicate a dose-related benefit. At the higher dose of 500U onabotA, no new safety signals were observed; AEs did not appear to be dose-related. Funding: Allergan


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document