Restorative proctectomy with colon pouch–anal anastomosis by laparoscopic transanal pull-through: an available option for low rectal cancer?

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Prete ◽  
F. P. Prete ◽  
R. De Luca ◽  
P. Nitti ◽  
D. Sammarco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anal Anastomosis ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Colon Pouch ◽  
Restorative Proctectomy

scholarly journals Reappraisal of pull-through delayed colo-anal anastomosis for surgical treatment of low rectal cancer: do we have to look back to go forward?

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Andrea Belli ◽  
Paola Incollingo ◽  
Armando Falato ◽  
Silvia De Franciscis ◽  
Francesco Bianco
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Look Back ◽  
Anal Anastomosis ◽  
Pull Through

“Scarless” and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Bianco ◽  
Andrea Belli ◽  
Silvia De Franciscis ◽  
Armando Falato ◽  
Giovanni Maria Romano
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anal Anastomosis ◽  
Pull Through

OUTCOME OF SPHINCTER PRESERVING RECTAL RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Vinh Quy Truong ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Quang Thuu Le
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Stage T1

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of sphincter-preserving rectal resection for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to January 2016, there are 52 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving rectal resection with total mesorectal excision with low rectal cancer (<6cm from the anal verge) at Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. Results: the average age 62.7 ± 12.8, the distance of tumor from anal verge include four group (≤ 3cm 1.9%; 3 to ≤ 4cm 17.3%; 4 to ≤ 5cm 34.6%; > 5 cm). T stage T1/ T2/T3: 1.9%/28.8%/69.2%. The following time is 33.8 ± 18.9 month. Overall recurrence was 13/18(27.1%), local recurrence was 5 (10.4%). Total survival was 40.5 ± 2.9 month. Technique: intersphincteric preservation 14 (26.9%), low anterior resection 17 (32.7%) and pull-through procedure 21 (40.4%). The distance of anatomosis from anal verge: from 1 to ≤ 2 cm:14 (26.9%); from 2 to ≤ 3cm: 21 (40.4%); from 3 to ≤ 4 cm: 17 (32.7%). Bowels movement of 3 month: 4.7 ± 3.2 and 12th month: 2.7 ± 1.6 (p< 0.01). Conclusions: Sphincterpreserving rectal resection using may provide a good continence and oncologic safety. The patients are acceptable with the results of functional outcomes. Key words: Low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving

Improved laparoscopic transanal pull-through technique for low-rectal cancer resection

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 606-609
Author(s):  
Taiyuan Li ◽  
Jianping Gong ◽  
Jinzhong Duanmu ◽  
Haitao Zhang ◽  
Xiong Lei
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Resection ◽  
Pull Through
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document