scholarly journals Predictors of response to palliative care intervention for chronic nausea in advanced cancer outpatients

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2427-2435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wadih Rhondali ◽  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
Gary Chisholm ◽  
Jeanette Ferrer ◽  
Sun Hyun Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Fliedner ◽  
Sofia Zambrano ◽  
Jos MGA Schols ◽  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Christa Lohrmann ◽  
...  

Background: Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients’ perspectives. However, little is known about how patients’ experience such interventions. Aim: To explore advanced cancer patients’ experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients’ life including influencing factors. Design: Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support,” a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. Results: Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel “confronting” but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients’ personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. Conclusion: Early palliative care interventions like “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support” may provoke emotions and feel “confrontational” often because this is the first time when issues about one’s end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.


JAMA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 302 (7) ◽  
pp. 741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Kathleen Doyle Lyons ◽  
Mark T. Hegel ◽  
Stefan Balan ◽  
Frances C. Brokaw ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Sigler ◽  
Andrew D. Althouse ◽  
Teresa H. Thomas ◽  
Robert M. Arnold ◽  
Douglas White ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer often have unrealistic expectations about prognosis and treatment. This study assessed the effect of an oncology nurse-led primary palliative care intervention on illness expectations among patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial of primary palliative care conducted at 17 oncology clinics. Adult patients with advanced solid tumors for whom the oncologist would not be surprised if died within 1 year were enrolled. Monthly visits were designed to foster realistic illness expectations by eliciting patient concerns and goals for their medical care and empowering patients and families to engage in discussions with oncologists about treatment options and preferences. Baseline and 3-month questionnaires included questions about life expectancy, treatment intent, and terminal illness acknowledgment. Odds of realistic illness expectations at 3 months were adjusted for baseline responses, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and intervention dose. RESULTS: Among 457 primarily White patients, there was little difference in realistic illness expectations at 3 months between intervention and standard care groups: 12.8% v 11.4% for life expectancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.59 to 2.22; P = .684); 24.6% v 33.3% for treatment intent (aOR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.27; P = .290); 53.6% v 44.7% for terminal illness acknowledgment (aOR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.81 to 2.00; P = .288). Results did not differ when accounting for variation in clinic sites or intervention dose. CONCLUSION: Illness expectations are difficult to change among patients with advanced cancer. Additional work is needed to identify approaches within oncology practices that foster realistic illness expectations to improve patient decision making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Heymann‐Horan ◽  
Pernille Envold Bidstrup ◽  
Christoffer Johansen ◽  
Nina Rottmann ◽  
Elisabeth Anne Wreford Andersen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yael Schenker ◽  
Andrew D. Althouse ◽  
Margaret Rosenzweig ◽  
Douglas B. White ◽  
Edward Chu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document