Palliative care needs of the cancer patients receiving active therapy

Author(s):  
Gülcan Bağçivan ◽  
Memnun Seven ◽  
Şeyma İnciser Paşalak ◽  
Ezgi Bilmiç ◽  
Yasemin Aydın ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Abigail Sy Chan ◽  
Amit Rout ◽  
Christopher R. D.’Adamo ◽  
Irina Lev ◽  
Amy Yu ◽  
...  

Background: Timely identification of palliative care needs can reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life. The Supportive & Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) identifies patients with advanced medical conditions who may need special care planning. The Rothman Index (RI) detects patients at high risk of acutely decompensating in the inpatient setting. SPICT and RI among cancer patients were utilized in this study to evaluate their potential roles in palliative care referrals. Methods: Advanced cancer patients admitted to an institution in Baltimore, Maryland in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay (LOS), palliative care referrals, RI scores, and SPICT scores were obtained. Patients were divided into SPICT positive or negative and RI > 60 or RI < 60.Unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests were utilized to determine the associations between SPICT and RI and early palliative care needs and mortality. Results: 227 patients were included, with a mean age of 68 years, 63% Black, 59% female, with the majority having lung and GI malignancies. Sixty percent were SPICT +, 21% had RI < 60. SPICT + patients were more likely to have RI < 60 (p = 0.001). SPICT + and RI < 60 patients were more likely to have longer LOS, change in code status, more palliative/hospice referrals, and increased mortality (p <0.05). Conclusions: SPICT and RI are valuable tools in predicting mortality and palliative/hospice care referrals. These can also be utilized to initiate early palliative and goals of care discussions in patients with advanced cancer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 693
Author(s):  
Isabelle Marcelin ◽  
Caroline McNaughton ◽  
Nicole Tang ◽  
Jeffrey Caterino ◽  
Corita Grudzen

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12102-12102
Author(s):  
Abigail Sy Chan ◽  
Amit Rout ◽  
Irina Lev ◽  
Amy Yu ◽  
Chris D'Adamo ◽  
...  

12102 Backgroun1d: Timely identification of palliative care needs have the ability to reduce hospitalizations and improve QOL. The Supportive & Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) is used to identify patients with advanced stage medical conditions who may need special care planning. The Rothman Index (RI) detects patients at high risk of acutely decompensating in the inpatient setting and has been validated to assess 24-hour mortality risk. We used SPICT and RI in cancer patients admitted to the hospital and evaluated their roles in recognizing early palliative care needs and 6-month mortality. Methods: Advanced/metastatic cancer patients admitted to our institution from Jan 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay (LOS), comorbidities, palliative/hospice care referrals, vital status, initial RI score, and computed SPICT scores were obtained. Worse clinical indicators were defined as SPICT positive if it met > 2 clinical indicators or RI < 60. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 227 patients were included, mean age 68, 34% Caucasians, 63% Blacks, 59% female, median comorbidities of 3, with majority having lung and GI malignancies. A total of 137 (60%) were SPICT +, 47 (21%) had RI < 60, and 38 (17%) concurrent SPICT + and RI < 60. SPICT + patients were more likely to have longer hospital stay, change in code status, more palliative/hospice referrals, and increased mortality. Those with RI < 60 had similar results (Table). SPICT + patients are more likely to have RI < 60 (p = 0.0013). Conclusions: SPICT and RI are valuable tools in predicting 6-month mortality and palliative/hospice care referrals. These can also be utilized to initiate early palliative and goals of care discussions in patients with advanced cancer. [Table: see text]


Lung Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S87
Author(s):  
J. Droney ◽  
Y. Kano ◽  
J. Nevin ◽  
L. Kamal ◽  
A. Kennett ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
Alison Lutz ◽  
Rachel Regn ◽  
William Robinson ◽  
William R. Robinson

61 Background: To determine differences in palliative care (PC) needs in newly diagnosed cancer patients from an inner-city academic facility compared to a suburban, community facility. Also, to identify ways to improve PC for cancer patients in these locations. Methods: 270 subjects with cancer were prospectively identified, 85 from an inner city academic facility (Site A), and 185 from a suburban community facility in the same metropolitan area. (Site B) All patients received treatment from board-certified oncologists. Master’s level Social Workers asked all subjects to complete a standardized, validated questionnaire to determine their palliative care needs prior to treatment. Completed questionnaires were collected and data was depersonalized and analyzed by the authors. Statistical differences were assessed using standard methods. Results: Site A patients were younger (56.3 vs 61.5years) less likely to be caucasian (35/85, 41.2% vs 114/185, 61.6%) and less likely to have private insurance (28/85, 32.9% vs 187/185, 47%). Site B patients were more likely to express a fear of pain, (112/185, 60.5% vs 28/85,32.9%) dying, (112/185, 60.5% vs 18/85, 21.2%) being alone, (112/185(60.5% vs 15/85, 17.7%) or nausea (117/185, 63.2% vs 10/85, 11.8%). Site A patients were more likely to express fear of not having transportation, (35/85, 41.2% vs 42/185, 22.1%) inability to pay for prescriptions, (28/85, 32.9% vs 40/185, 21.6%) or child care (13/85, 15.3% vs 9/185, 4.9%). All differences were significant at a p < 0.05. Conclusions: There are major differences in the PC needs of patients presenting to an inner-city academic vs suburban community facility. To be most effective, PC programs must be tailored to the community. Interventions proposed for the suburban community facility include early access to: 1) grief counseling, 2) support groups, 3) Nurse-Navigators. Interventions proposed for the inner city academic facility include early access to: 1) Medication cost assistance programs (local philanthropies, facility-based pharmacy discounts) 2) travel services (cab vouchers, coordination with public transportation schedules) 3) on-site child care facilities.


2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Griffiths ◽  
Gail Ewing ◽  
Margaret Rogers ◽  
Stephen Barclay ◽  
Anna Martin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 231-243
Author(s):  
Nathan I Cherny ◽  
Shani Paluch-Shimon ◽  
Yael Berner-Wygoda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document