The quality of end of life care for Danish cancer patients who have received specialized palliative: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lone Ross ◽  
Mette Asbjoern Neergaard ◽  
Morten Aagaard Petersen ◽  
Mogens Groenvold
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
National Survey ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Danish Version

scholarly journals Trends in quality of end-of-life care for Taiwanese cancer patients who died in 2000–2006

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.T. Tang ◽  
S.-C. Wu ◽  
Y.-N. Hung ◽  
E.-W. Huang ◽  
J.-S. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care

scholarly journals Impact of timing and setting of palliative care referral on quality of end-of-life care in cancer patients

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (11) ◽  
pp. 1743-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hui ◽  
Sun Hyun Kim ◽  
Joyce Roquemore ◽  
Rony Dev ◽  
Gary Chisholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care

scholarly journals End-of-life Care Preferences among Cancer Patients in Southern Thailand: A University Hospital-based Cross-Sectional Survey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarurin Pitanupong ◽  
Sahawit Janmanee
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background: End-of-life care preferences may be highly individual, heterogenic, and variable according to culture and belief. This study aimed to explore preferences and factors associated with end-of-life care among Thai cancer patients with the goal of helping optimize their quality of life.Methods: A cross-sectional study surveyed cancer outpatients at Songklanagarind Hospital from August to November 2020. The questionnaires inquired about: 1) personal and demographic information, 2) experiences with end-of-life care received by relatives, and 3) end-of-life care preferences. To determine end-of life preferences, the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The data concerning patient demographics and end-of-life care preferences were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: The majority of the 96 cancer outpatients were female (65.6%), and the overall mean age was 55.8 ±11.6 years. More than half of them had an experience of observing someone die (68.8%), and they were predominantly satisfied with the care received by their relatives in passing away at home surrounded by family (47.0%) and being conscious until the time of death (68.2%). Most participants preferred receiving the full truth regarding their illness (99.0%), being free of uncomfortable symptoms (96.9%), having their loved ones around (93.8%), being mentally aware at the last hour (93.8%), and having the sense of being meaningful in life (92.7%). Their 3 most important end-of-life care wishes were receiving the full truth regarding their illness, disclosing the full truth regarding their illness to family members, and passing away at home. Conclusion: In order to optimize the quality of life of terminal patients, end-of-life care should ensure they receive the full truth regarding their illness, experience no distress symptoms, remain mentally aware at the last hour of life, feel meaningful in life, and pass away comfortably with loved ones around.

Quality of End of Life Care among Metastatic Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. e423
Author(s):  
K. Sborov ◽  
S. Giaretta ◽  
A. Koong ◽  
S. Aggarwal ◽  
R. Von Eyben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Life Care

Development of a Proxy Quality-of-Life Rating Scale for the End-of-Life Care of Pediatric Cancer Patients Evaluated from a Nurse's Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Nagoya ◽  
Mitsunori Miyashita ◽  
Wataru Irie ◽  
Nobuyuki Yotani ◽  
Hitoshi Shiwaku
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients

Patients' perspectives on participation in clinical trials and palliative end-of-life care for management of advanced cancers in Nigeria.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Jideuma Ikenna Egwim ◽  
Smita Palejwala
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Dying

78 Background: Advanced cancers remain a major cause of mortality in Nigeria. Participation in clinical trials (PCTs) and palliative end-of-life care (PEOLC) are two approaches to incurable cancer management in the developed nations but these have been less adopted in Nigeria. This study set out to determine patients’ preferred approach between PCTs and PEOLC for management of advanced cancers in Nigeria. Methods: A survey of 120 advanced cancer patients was conducted using a questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale, variables of interest included demographic information, knowledge and perception about PCTs and PEOLC. Results: Majority of the patients (84%) agree PCTs is an option in management of incurable cancer but just about half accept it is beneficial and will improve their QOL, as against PEOLC, where all the patients considered it an option and deem it beneficial; with 99% and 98% respectively agreeing it will enhance their QOL and that of family members. About 56% believe PCTs carries a risk of burdensome interventions and 52% increased hospital stay at EOL while 47% are of the opinion it will increase cost of care with 45% stating it will lead to increased ICU death. Sixty-nine percent (69%) and 63% respectively agree PCTs increases the suffering of patients and family members while 43% believe it carries a net negative risk-benefit profile, nevertheless, 83% are ready to overlook the risk of PCTs for possible therapeutic benefit while for 87%, the primary motivation for PCTs is personal cure. Majority (58%) believe PCTs does not improve quality of dying/death contrary to PEOLC where 88% believe it would improve the quality of dying/death. Overall, by direct comparison 78%:13% prefer PEOL to PCTs; {X2(p-value), 40.26(0.001)}. Conclusions: Both modalities are acceptable to advanced cancer patients but the study reveals several ethical issues with PCTs including risk of burdensome interventions, suffering of patients, therapeutic misconception and misperception of curability. A major determinant to accepting PEOL is its positive impact on patients’ QOL. Concerted efforts are needed to significantly enhance access of PEOLC to cancer patients.

scholarly journals End-of-life care preferences among cancer patients in Southern Thailand: a university hospital-based cross-sectional survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarurin Pitanupong ◽  
Sahawit Janmanee
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background End-of-life care preferences may be highly individual, heterogenic, and variable according to culture and belief. This study aimed to explore preferences and factors associated with end-of-life care among Thai cancer patients. Its findings could help optimize the quality of life of palliative cancer patients. Methods A cross-sectional study surveyed palliative cancer outpatients at Songklanagarind Hospital from August to November 2020. The questionnaires inquired about: (1) personal and demographic information, (2) experiences with end-of-life care for their relatives, and (3) end-of-life care preferences. To determine end-of life preferences, the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The data concerning patient demographics and end-of-life care preferences were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results The majority of the 96 palliative cancer outpatients were female (65.6 %), and the overall mean age was 55.8 ± 11.6 years. More than half of them had an experience of observing someone die (68.8 %), and they were predominantly being conscious until the time of death (68.2 %). Most participants preferred receiving the full truth satisfied with the care their relatives had received in passing away at home surrounded by family (47.0 %) and regarding their illness (99.0 %), being free of uncomfortable symptoms (96.9 %), having their loved ones around (93.8 %), being mentally aware at the last hour (93.8 %), and having the sense of being meaningful in life (92.7 %). Their 3 most important end-of-life care wishes were receiving the full truth regarding their illness, disclosing the full truth regarding their illness to family members, and passing away at home. Conclusions In order to optimize the quality of life of palliative cancer patients, end-of-life care should ensure they receive the full truth regarding their illness, experience no distressing symptoms, remain mentally aware at the last hour of life, feel meaningful in life, and pass away comfortably with loved ones around.

Predictors of home death and the quality of end-of-life care at a cancer center in Brazil.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24004-e24004
Author(s):  
Sarah Gomes ◽  
Danielle Silva ◽  
Júlia Sá ◽  
Thais Passarini ◽  
Matheus Viana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Home Death

e24004 Background: Early palliative care has shown an improvement in the quality of life of cancer patients by reducing overtreatment at the end of life and improving symptomatic control. Little is known about the quality of death in developing countries. End-of-life cancer care varies widely, and very few centers evaluate it systematically. The aim of the present study is to analyze the impact of follow-up of cancer patients by an outpatient palliative care team (OPCT) on the end-of-life outcomes at a Cancer Center in Brazil. Methods: We retrospectively retrieved data from electronic medical records of cancer patients who were treated at a Cancer Center in Brazil and who died from cancer or associated complications during the year of 2020. They were divided into two groups: OPCT and No-OPCT. OPCT group was followed-up by a multidisciplinary team composed of physician, nurse, physiotherapist, psychologist, nutritionist, social worker, speech-language therapist, and pharmacist, who regularly evaluated cancer patients during their treatments at outpatient setting. During COVID-19 pandemic, some patients were evaluated by telemedicine appointments. No-OPCT group was followed-up by cancer physicians exclusively. We performed univariate comparisons and multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model. p < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: A total of 315 patients were included in the study: OPCT (N=122) and No-OPCT (N=193). The groups were well balanced in relation to median age (61yo vs 63yo), gender (women: 51% vs 54%), and TNM stage (stage IV: 69% vs 65%). Gastrointestinal and breast cancers were the most prevalent. The rate of home death was 44% in the OPCT group, compared to 16% in the No-OPCT group (p<0.001). The rate of admission in intensive care unit in the last 30 days of life (ICU30) was 13% vs 10%, respectively (p=0.413). Likewise, the rate of patients treated with chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life (CT30) was 42% vs 51% (p=0.146). In multivariate analysis, follow-up by the OPCT was the strongest independent predictor of home death (Table). In contrast, ICU30 and CT30 were inversely correlated with this outcome. Age, gender, and TNM stage did not have influence on the place of death. Conclusions: Follow-up by an OPCT had a strong positive impact on end-of-life care of cancer patients in a country which does not have Hospice culture. The OPCT was able to offer home death to a greater number of patients, with proximity to caregivers, and respect to their beliefs and values. Our data highlight the importance of early conversations about goals of care, prognostic awareness, and end-of-life preferences, while also reinforcing the need of early referral to a palliative care team.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document