scholarly journals Erratum to: Distal junctional kyphosis in patients with Scheuermann’s disease: a retrospective radiographic analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1564-1564
Author(s):  
Amir Ghasemi ◽  
Timo Stubig ◽  
Luigi Aurelio Nasto ◽  
Malik Ahmed ◽  
Hossein Mehdian
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 913-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Ghasemi ◽  
Timo Stubig ◽  
Luigi A. Nasto ◽  
Malik Ahmed ◽  
Hossein Mehdian

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
Mikhail Vitalyevich Mikhaylovskiy

Objective. To analyze literature data on the frequency of junctional kyphosis in surgery for Scheuermann’s disease, its relationship withspinopelvic parameters, risk factors and prevention of its development.Material and Methods. A search for sources in Scopus and Web of Science databases revealed 62 articles published from 1975 to 2021 and containing the required information. Of these, 56 publications meet the inclusion criteria.Results. The selected 56 articles contain data on 2,110 patients. In total, 247 (11.8 %) cases of proximal junctional kyphosis were diagnosed, including 6 (0.3 %) cases of proximal junctional failure. The total number of distal junctional kyphosis cases was 124 (5.9 %). Forty-five reoperations were performed. Many potential risk factors have been identified in publications, but there is no consensus on any of them.As a result, there is no a well-founded common position on the prevention of junctional kyphosis development. Spinopelvic parameters in Scheuermann’s disease are significantly less than those in the general population and do not tend to change after surgical correction of kyphosis. As for their relationship with the risk of development of proximal and distal junctional kyphosis, there is no consensus to date.Conclusion. This review is the largest in terms of coverage of literary sources on the problem of the development of junctional kyphosis in surgery for Scheuermann’s disease. The causes for the development of this complication remain unknown, hence there is the lack of generally accepted methods of prevention. New studies with long postoperative follow-up are needed.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip G. Wilcox ◽  
Curtis W. Spencer

Scoliosis ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
AG Aulisa ◽  
V Guzzanti ◽  
C Perisano ◽  
G Mastantuoni ◽  
L Aulisa

Author(s):  
Elise C. Bixby ◽  
Kira Skaggs ◽  
Gerard F. Marciano ◽  
Matthew E. Simhon ◽  
Richard P. Menger ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Institutions investigating value and quality emphasize utilization of two attending surgeons with different areas of technical expertise to treat complex surgical cases and to minimize complications. Here, the authors chronicle the 12-year experience of using a two–attending surgeon, two-specialty model to perform hemivertebra resection in the pediatric population. METHODS Retrospective cohort data from 2008 to 2019 were obtained from the NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital operative database. This database included all consecutive pediatric patients < 21 years old who underwent hemivertebra resection performed with the two–attending surgeon (neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon) model. Demographic information was extracted. Intraoperative complications, including durotomy and direct neurological injury, were queried from the clinical records. Intraoperative neuromonitoring data were evaluated. Postoperative complications were queried, and length of follow-up was determined from the clinical records. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, 22 patients with a median (range) age of 9.1 (2.0–19.3) years underwent hemivertebra resection with the two–attending surgeon, two-specialty model. The median (range) number of levels fused was 2 (0–16). The mean (range) operative time was 5 hours and 14 minutes (2 hours and 59 minutes to 8 hours and 30 minutes), and the median (range) estimated blood loss was 325 (80–2700) ml. Navigation was used in 14% (n = 3) of patients. Neither Gardner-Wells tongs nor halo traction was used in any operation. Neuromonitoring signals significantly decreased or were lost in 14% (n = 3) of patients. At a mean ± SD (range) follow-up of 4.6 ± 3.4 (1.0–11.6) years, 31% (n = 7) of patients had a postoperative complication, including 2 instances of proximal junctional kyphosis, 2 instances of distal junctional kyphosis, 2 wound complications, 1 instance of pseudoarthrosis with hardware failure, and 1 instance of screw pullout. The return to the operating room (OR) rate was 27% (n = 6), which included patients with the abovementioned wound complications, distal junctional kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis, and screw pullout, as well as a patient who required spinal fusion after loss of motor evoked potentials during index surgery. CONCLUSIONS Twenty-two patients underwent hemivertebra resection with a two–attending surgeon, two-specialty model over a 12-year period at a specialized children’s hospital, with a 14% rate of change in neuromonitoring, 32% rate of nonneurological complications, and a 27% rate of unplanned return to the OR.


2010 ◽  
pp. 416-417
Author(s):  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
Gregory K. Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document