Clinical outcomes and complication profile of total hip arthroplasty after lumbar spine fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Randolph Onggo ◽  
Mithun Nambiar ◽  
Jason Derry Onggo ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Anuruban Ambikaipalan ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (04) ◽  
pp. 193-200
Author(s):  
Daniel K. Witmer ◽  
Evan R. Deckard ◽  
R. Michael Meneghini

AbstractDislocation rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with fixed spinopelvic motion have been reported as high as 20%. Few studies exist specifically for lumbar spine degenerative joint disease (DJD) and its relationship to THA instability. There were two study objectives: (1) report the incidence of lumbar spine DJD and previous lumbar spine fusion and (2) evaluate the relationship of these two conditions and other potential risk factors to postoperative dislocation after THA. We retrospectively reviewed 818 consecutive THAs performed by a single surgeon utilizing a posterior approach. Comprehensive medical chart and radiographic review was performed to identify patients with lumbar spine DJD and lumbar spine fusion. Radiographic measurements, patient factors, surgical factors, and incidences of dislocation also were recorded. Eight hundred and twelve THAs were analyzed. There were 10 dislocations (1.2%, 10/812). Lumbar spine DJD and previous lumbar spine fusion occurred in 33.4% (271/812) and 5.9% (48/812) of patients, respectively. Lumbar spine DJD, acetabular protrusio, and female sex were significant predictors of dislocation using a Firth penalized maximum likelihood estimation specifically for rare events (area under receiver-operator characteristic curve = 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.86, 0.96). Interestingly, only 2 of 10 dislocations had a previous lumbar spine fusion. Lumbar spine DJD, acetabular protrusio, and female sex were significant predictors of dislocation, while lumbar spine fusion was largely unrelated. This study used data available to most practicing surgeons and provides useful information for counseling patients preoperatively.


2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-141135
Author(s):  
Vishal Kumar ◽  
Sandeep Patel ◽  
Vishnu Baburaj ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Rajnish ◽  
Sameer Aggarwal

BackgroundRobot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an emerging technology that claims to position implants with very high accuracy. However, there is currently limited data in literature on whether this improved accuracy leads to better long-term clinical outcomes. This systematic review compares the outcomes of THA done with the help of robotic assistance (RA) to those done with conventional manual techniques (MTs).MethodsFour electronic databases were searched for eligible articles that directly compared robot-assisted THA to manual THA and had data on the radiological or clinical outcomes of both. Data on various outcome parameters were collected. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with 95% CIs.ResultsA total of 17 articles were found eligible for inclusion, and 3600 cases were analysed. Mean operating time in the RA group was significantly longer than in the MT group. RA resulted in significantly more acetabular cups being placed inside Lewinnek’s and Callanan’s safe zones (p<0.001) and had significantly reduced limb length discrepancy compared with MT. There were no statistically significant differences in the two groups in terms of incidence of perioperative complications, need for revision surgery and long-term functional outcome.ConclusionRA leads to highly accurate implant placement and leads to significantly reduced limb length discrepancies. However, the authors do not recommend robot-assisted techniques for routine THAs due to lack of adequate long-term follow-up data, prolonged surgical times and no significant differences in the rate of complications and implant survivorship compared with conventional MTs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-456
Author(s):  
Adrian D. Hinman ◽  
Maria C.S. Inacio ◽  
Heather A. Prentice ◽  
Calvin C. Kuo ◽  
Monti Khatod ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 3768-3772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connor A. King ◽  
David C. Landy ◽  
John M. Martell ◽  
Hue H. Luu ◽  
Lewis L. Shi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 907-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur L. Malkani ◽  
Kevin J. Himschoot ◽  
Kevin L. Ong ◽  
Edmund C. Lau ◽  
Doruk Baykal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Chen ◽  
Jian-Ning Sun ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Xiang-Yang Chen ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Klemt ◽  
Anand Padmanabha ◽  
Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala ◽  
Paul Walker ◽  
Evan J. Smith ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Nessler ◽  
Arthur L. Malkani ◽  
Shikha Sachdeva ◽  
Joseph P. Nessler ◽  
Geoff Westrich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document