Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoya Arabori ◽  
Nobuzo Matsui ◽  
Ryosuke Kuroda ◽  
Kiyonori Mizuno ◽  
Minoru Doita ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
K-T. Kang ◽  
Y-G. Koh ◽  
J. Son ◽  
O-R. Kwon ◽  
J-S. Lee ◽  
...  

ObjectivesPosterior condylar offset (PCO) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) are critical factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A computational simulation was performed to evaluate the biomechanical effect of PCO and PTS on cruciate retaining TKA.MethodsWe generated a subject-specific computational model followed by the development of ± 1 mm, ± 2 mm and ± 3 mm PCO models in the posterior direction, and -3°, 0°, 3° and 6° PTS models with each of the PCO models. Using a validated finite element (FE) model, we investigated the influence of the changes in PCO and PTS on the contact stress in the patellar button and the forces on the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), patellar tendon and quadriceps muscles under the deep knee-bend loading conditions.ResultsContact stress on the patellar button increased and decreased as PCO translated to the anterior and posterior directions, respectively. In addition, contact stress on the patellar button decreased as PTS increased. These trends were consistent in the FE models with altered PCO. Higher quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon force are required as PCO translated in the anterior direction with an equivalent flexion angle. However, as PTS increased, quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon force reduced in each PCO condition. The forces exerted on the PCL increased as PCO translated to the posterior direction and decreased as PTS increased.ConclusionThe change in PCO alternatively provided positive and negative biomechanical effects, but it led to a reduction in a negative biomechanical effect as PTS increased. Cite this article: K-T. Kang, Y-G. Koh, J. Son, O-R. Kwon, J-S. Lee, S. K. Kwon. A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:69–78. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0143.R1.


Orthopedics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (10/SUPPLEMENT) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Suk Seo ◽  
Dong-Jun Ha ◽  
Chang-Wan Kim ◽  
Jang-Seok Choi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
bangwei Shen ◽  
Hao Han ◽  
Tao Huang ◽  
Xu Luo ◽  
Zi-Hao Li ◽  
...  

Abstract IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two ways of establishing the flexion gap on the flexion angle and flexion-extension motion after posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis. A way for the posterior slope angle(PSA)and posterior condylar offset(PCO)were greater than preoperative, another for less than preoperative.Materials and MethodsThey are grouped according to the way flexion gaps are constructed. Data from 28 total knee arthroplasty(TKA)patients treated with propensity score match (PSM) were included. The difference of flexion angle and flexion-extension motion between the two groups was compared, and the influence of PCO and PSA on the flexion angle in the two ways was analyzed.ResultsPostoperative flexion degree of the two groups was 115.50±14.64° and 112.29±10.64° (P =0.553), and there was no statistical significance. Postoperative flexion-extension motion grade data of the decrease group was better than that of the increased group (P =0.031). Postoperative flexion angle was negatively correlated with PCO change in the increase group (r²=0.574 b '=-0.758 p=0.002).ConclusionsIncreasing the PSA and PCO to construct flexion gaps in PS TKA will cause problems with flexion-extension movements. It may be more reasonable to avoid excessive PSA and select appropriate PCO to reconstruct the flexion gap in PS prosthetic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document