scholarly journals On the quasi-sure superhedging duality with frictions

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-275
Author(s):  
Erhan Bayraktar ◽  
Matteo Burzoni
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Financial Market ◽  
Discrete Time ◽  
Natural Condition ◽  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Original Model ◽  
Restrictive Assumption ◽  
Proportional Transaction Costs ◽  
No Arbitrage ◽  
Portfolio Constraints

AbstractWe prove the superhedging duality for a discrete-time financial market with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty. Frictions are modelled through solvency cones as in the original model of Kabanov (Finance Stoch. 3:237–248, 1999) adapted to the quasi-sure setup of Bouchard and Nutz (Ann. Appl. Probab. 25:823–859, 2015). Our approach allows removing the restrictive assumption of no arbitrage of the second kind considered in Bouchard et al. (Math. Finance 29:837–860, 2019) and showing the duality under the more natural condition of strict no arbitrage. In addition, we extend the results to models with portfolio constraints.

scholarly journals Utility Maximization with Proportional Transaction Costs Under Model Uncertainty

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1210-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuoqing Deng ◽  
Xiaolu Tan ◽  
Xiang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Programming ◽  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Utility Maximization ◽  
Exponential Utility ◽  
Market Condition ◽  
Maximization Problem ◽  
Proportional Transaction Costs ◽  
Utility Indifference ◽  
Basic Features

We consider a discrete time financial market with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty and study a numéraire-based semistatic utility maximization problem with an exponential utility preference. The randomization techniques recently developed in Bouchard, Deng, and Tan [Bouchard B, Deng S, Tan X (2019) Super-replication with proportional transaction cost under model uncertainty. Math. Finance 29(3):837–860.], allow us to transform the original problem into a frictionless counterpart on an enlarged space. By suggesting a different dynamic programming argument than in Bartl [Bartl D (2019) Exponential utility maximization under model uncertainty for unbounded endowments. Ann. Appl. Probab. 29(1):577–612.], we are able to prove the existence of the optimal strategy and the convex duality theorem in our context with transaction costs. In the frictionless framework, this alternative dynamic programming argument also allows us to generalize the main results in Bartl [Bartl D (2019) Exponential utility maximization under model uncertainty for unbounded endowments. Ann. Appl. Probab. 29(1):577–612.] to a weaker market condition. Moreover, as an application of the duality representation, some basic features of utility indifference prices are investigated in our robust setting with transaction costs.

MINIMIZING THE PROBABILITY OF LIFETIME RUIN: TWO RISKLESS ASSETS WITH TRANSACTION COSTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (03) ◽  
pp. 847-883
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Liang ◽  
Virginia R. Young
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Financial Market ◽  
Optimal Investment ◽  
Investment Strategy ◽  
Money Market ◽  
The Other ◽  
Proportional Transaction Costs ◽  
Optimal Investment Strategy ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Riskless Asset

AbstractWe compute the optimal investment strategy for an individual who wishes to minimize her probability of lifetime ruin. The financial market in which she invests consists of two riskless assets. One riskless asset is a money market, and she consumes from that account. The other riskless asset is a bond that earns a higher interest rate than the money market, but buying and selling bonds are subject to proportional transaction costs. We consider the following three cases. (1) The individual is allowed to borrow from both riskless assets; ruin occurs if total imputed wealth reaches zero. Under the optimal strategy, the individual does not sell short the bond. However, she might wish to borrow from the money market to fund her consumption. Thus, in the next two cases, we seek to limit borrowing from that account. (2) We assume that the individual pays a higher rate to borrow than she earns on the money market. (3) The individual is not allowed to borrow from either asset; ruin occurs if both the money market and bond accounts reach zero wealth. We prove that the borrowing rate in case (2) acts as a parameter connecting the two seemingly unrelated cases (1) and (3).

scholarly journals NO-ARBITRAGE PRICING FOR DIVIDEND-PAYING SECURITIES IN DISCRETE-TIME MARKETS WITH TRANSACTION COSTS

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz R. Bielecki ◽  
Igor Cialenco ◽  
Rodrigo Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Discrete Time ◽  
Arbitrage Pricing ◽  
No Arbitrage

Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs and Jump-Diffusion Asset Dynamics I: A Numerical Solution

2016 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 1650018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Czerwonko ◽  
Stylianos Perrakis
Keyword(s):  
Diffusion Process ◽  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Discrete Time ◽  
Continuous Time ◽  
Jump Diffusion ◽  
Numerical Approach ◽  
Proportional Transaction Costs ◽  
Asset Portfolio ◽  
Time Formulation

We derive allocation rules under isoelastic utility for a mixed jump-diffusion process in a two-asset portfolio selection problem with finite horizon in the presence of proportional transaction costs. We adopt a discrete-time formulation, let the number of periods go to infinity, and show that it converges efficiently to the continuous-time solution for the cases where this solution is known. We then apply this discretization to derive numerically the boundaries of the region of no transactions. Our discrete-time numerical approach outperforms alternative continuous-time approximations of the problem.

scholarly journals Geometric No-Arbitrage Analysis in the Dynamic Financial Market with Transaction Costs

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Wanxiao Tang ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Peibiao Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Financial Market ◽  
Expected Utility ◽  
Maximization Problem ◽  
No Arbitrage ◽  
The One

The present paper considers a class of financial market with transaction costs and constructs a geometric no-arbitrage analysis frame. Then, this paper arrives at the fact that this financial market is of no-arbitrage if and only if the curvature 2-form of a specific connection is zero. Furthermore, this paper derives the fact that the no-arbitrage condition for the one-period financial market is equivalent to the geometric no-arbitrage condition. Finally, an example states the equivalence between the geometric no-arbitrage condition and the existence of the solutions for a maximization problem of expected utility.

No Arbitrage in Discrete Time Under Portfolio Constraints

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Carassus ◽  
Huye^n Pham ◽  
Nizar Touzi
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Time ◽  
No Arbitrage ◽  
Portfolio Constraints
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document