No apparent association between dental implants and mandibular fractures resulting from external forces

Author(s):  
Shunsuke Hino ◽  
Tateyuki Iizuka ◽  
Nikola Saulacic ◽  
Niklaus P. Lang ◽  
John-Patrik M. Burkhard
2021 ◽  
pp. 089875642110449
Author(s):  
Jaime Sarda Aramburú ◽  
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke ◽  
Berenice Anina Dedavid ◽  
Tiago Luis Eilers Treichel ◽  
Ney Luis Pippi

Dental implants are not routinely used for rehabilitation in veterinary dentistry. For some veterinarians, further studies are necessary to be considered for clinical use in animals. The objective of the present in vitro study was to evaluate static fatigue of dental implants and to correlate that with the bite strength of dogs described in the literature. Sixty implants and abutments were used with the smallest diameter of each brand of implant utilized in the study. Three groups ( n  =  20) were created on the basis of the implant diameter, all with external hex connector: 3.30 mm (group 1), 4.0 mm (group 2) and 5.0 mm (group 3). All groups were subjected to quasi-static loading at 30° to the implant's long axis in a universal machine (model AME-5 kN). The mean fracture strength for group 1 was 964 ± 187 N, for group 2 was 1618 ± 149 N and for group 3 was 2595 ± 161 N. Significant differences between the groups with respect to resistance after the load applications were observed ( P < .05). The diameter of implants affects the resistance to external forces during the application of non-axial strength (off-axis loading) and must be considered during the planning of rehabilitation to avoid problems.


1990 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 688-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Jacobson ◽  
B Maxson ◽  
K Mays ◽  
J Peebles ◽  
C Kowalski

1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Calloway ◽  
Mark A. Anton ◽  
Jonathan S. Jacobs
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
M G P Cavalcanti ◽  
J Yang ◽  
A Ruprecht ◽  
M W Vannier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document