scholarly journals European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part II: pharmacological treatment

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veit Roessner ◽  
◽  
Kerstin J. Plessen ◽  
Aribert Rothenberger ◽  
Andrea G. Ludolph ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veit Roessner ◽  
Katja Schoenefeld ◽  
Judith Buse ◽  
Stephan Bender ◽  
Stefan Ehrlich ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 155-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle C. Cath ◽  
◽  
Tammy Hedderly ◽  
Andrea G. Ludolph ◽  
Jeremy S. Stern ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl ◽  
◽  
Danielle C. Cath ◽  
Andrea E. Cavanna ◽  
Sandra Dehning ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Natalia Szejko ◽  
Yulia Worbe ◽  
Andreas Hartmann ◽  
Veerle Visser-Vandewalle ◽  
Linda Ackermans ◽  
...  

AbstractIn 2011 the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) published its first European clinical guidelines for the treatment of Tourette Syndrome (TS) with part IV on deep brain stimulation (DBS). Here, we present a revised version of these guidelines with updated recommendations based on the current literature covering the last decade as well as a survey among ESSTS experts. Currently, data from the International Tourette DBS Registry and Database, two meta-analyses, and eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available. Interpretation of outcomes is limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up periods. Compared to open uncontrolled case studies, RCTs report less favorable outcomes with conflicting results. This could be related to several different aspects including methodological issues, but also substantial placebo effects. These guidelines, therefore, not only present currently available data from open and controlled studies, but also include expert knowledge. Although the overall database has increased in size since 2011, definite conclusions regarding the efficacy and tolerability of DBS in TS are still open to debate. Therefore, we continue to consider DBS for TS as an experimental treatment that should be used only in carefully selected, severely affected and otherwise treatment-resistant patients.


Author(s):  
Veit Roessner ◽  
Heike Eichele ◽  
Jeremy S. Stern ◽  
Liselotte Skov ◽  
Renata Rizzo ◽  
...  

AbstractIn 2011, the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) published the first European guidelines for Tourette Syndrome (TS). We now present an update of the part on pharmacological treatment, based on a review of new literature with special attention to other evidence-based guidelines, meta-analyses, and randomized double-blinded studies. Moreover, our revision took into consideration results of a recent survey on treatment preferences conducted among ESSTS experts. The first preference should be given to psychoeducation and to behavioral approaches, as it strengthens the patients’ self-regulatory control and thus his/her autonomy. Because behavioral approaches are not effective, available, or feasible in all patients, in a substantial number of patients pharmacological treatment is indicated, alone or in combination with behavioral therapy. The largest amount of evidence supports the use of dopamine blocking agents, preferably aripiprazole because of a more favorable profile of adverse events than first- and second-generation antipsychotics. Other agents that can be considered include tiapride, risperidone, and especially in case of co-existing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), clonidine and guanfacine. This view is supported by the results of our survey on medication preference among members of ESSTS, in which aripiprazole was indicated as the drug of first choice both in children and adults. In treatment resistant cases, treatment with agents with either a limited evidence base or risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects might be considered, including pimozide, haloperidol, topiramate, cannabis-based agents, and botulinum toxin injections. Overall, treatment of TS should be individualized, and decisions based on the patient’s needs and preferences, presence of co-existing conditions, latest scientific findings as well as on the physician’s preferences, experience, and local regulatory requirements.


Author(s):  
Per Andrén ◽  
Ewgeni Jakubovski ◽  
Tara L. Murphy ◽  
Katrin Woitecki ◽  
Zsanett Tarnok ◽  
...  

AbstractPart II of the European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders (ECAP journal, 2011) provides updated information and recommendations for psychological interventions for individuals with tic disorders, created by a working group of the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS). A systematic literature search was conducted to obtain original studies of psychological interventions for tic disorders, published since the initial European clinical guidelines were issued. Relevant studies were identified using computerized searches of the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases for the years 2011–2019 and a manual search for the years 2019–2021. Based on clinical consensus, psychoeducation is recommended as an initial intervention regardless of symptom severity. According to a systematic literature search, most evidence was found for Habit Reversal Training (HRT), primarily the expanded package Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT). Evidence was also found for Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP), but to a lesser degree of certainty than HRT/CBIT due to fewer studies. Currently, cognitive interventions and third-wave interventions are not recommended as stand-alone treatments for tic disorders. Several novel treatment delivery formats are currently being evaluated, of which videoconference delivery of HRT/CBIT has the most evidence to date. To summarize, when psychoeducation alone is insufficient, both HRT/CBIT and ERP are recommended as first-line interventions for tic disorders. As part of the development of the clinical guidelines, a survey is reported from ESSTS members and other tic disorder experts on preference, use and availability of psychological interventions for tic disorders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document