Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the "Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire"

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Smedje ◽  
J.-E. Broman ◽  
J. Hetta ◽  
A.-L. von Knorring
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Swedish Version ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ortuna-Sierra ◽  
E. Fonseca-Pedrero ◽  
M. Paino ◽  
I. Sastre ◽  
S. Rina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties

Is the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire applicable to lower educated adolescents?

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Theunissen ◽  
M de Wolff
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Behavioral Problems ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Emotional And Behavioral Problems ◽  
Highly Educated ◽  
Preventive Child Healthcare ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties ◽  
Optimal Implementation

Abstract Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire self-report (SDQ-SR) is a widely used instrument to identify emotional and behavioral problems by Preventive Child Healthcare (PCH). It is a valid instrument in more highly educated adolescents, however evidence regarding lower educated adolescents (vocational school) is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the SDQ-SR when used with less well and more highly educated ('higher') adolescents, and to explore opinions of adolescents and PCH professionals regarding its suitability. Methods We included 426 adolescents (130 lower and 296 higher educated), who completed the SDQ-SR. We compared how the psychometric properties (i.e. internal consistency) applied to lower and higher educated adolescents. We assessed whether the five-factor structure of the SDQ is invariant across different educational levels. Moreover, we interviewed 24 adolescents from pre-vocational secondary education schools, and performed online focus group interviews with 17 PCH professionals. Results The internal consistencies (Cronbach's alphas) per SDQ scale were comparable for lower and higher educated adolescents. On most subscales the lower educated adolescents had higher mean scores than the higher educated adolescents. Findings on differences by educational level for the other psychometric properties, i.e. multi-group invariance and single group (CFA) analyses, were inconsistent, with some measures showing unequal factor loadings but others not. Although professionals and lower educated adolescents reported that the SDQ includes many outdated and difficult words, professionals nevertheless perceived the SDQ-SR as a valid instrument. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the SDQ-SR are sufficient for use among lower educated adolescents. However, for optimal implementation in PCH there is a need for improvement in the wording of the SDQ, as expressed by both professionals and adolescents. Key messages The psychometric properties of the SDQ are sufficient for use among lower educated adolescents. For optimal implementation the SDQ needs to be updated in more understandable language.

Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for the Preschool Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Two-Year-Old Children

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie D’Souza ◽  
Karen E Waldie ◽  
Elizabeth R. Peterson ◽  
Lisa Underwood ◽  
Susan M. B. Morton
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties

Psychometric properties of the Arabic self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Mohamed Emam ◽  
Maher M. Abu Hilal ◽  
Ali Mahdi Kazem ◽  
Suad Juma Alkharousi
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties

scholarly journals Qualidades psicométricas do Questionário de Capacidades e Dificuldades: revisão da literatura

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Martins Saur ◽  
Sonia Regina Loureiro
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties

O Questionário de Capacidades e Dificuldades (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) é um instrumento amplamente pesquisado, de uso livre, que visa avaliar a saúde mental de crianças e adolescentes. Dada a relevância do uso de instrumentos aferidos para a avaliação de indicadores de saúde mental, este trabalho objetivou analisar a produção científica relacionada às propriedades psicométricas do Questionário. Procedeu-se a um levantamento bibliográfico de estudos indexados nas bases de dados MedLine, PsycINFO e Lilacs, a partir da publicação original do instrumento, abrangendo o período de 1997 a 2010, utilizando-se as seguintes palavraschave: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and psychometric properties; e Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and validity or reliability. Foram selecionados e analisados 51 estudos psicométricos. Os resultados indicaram índices positivos de validade e fidedignidade em 21 países, incluindo o Brasil, caracterizando seu alcance transcultural e sua aplicabilidade na área de saúde mental infanto-juvenil .

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisanne L. Stone ◽  
Roy Otten ◽  
Rutger C. M. E. Engels ◽  
Ad A. Vermulst ◽  
Jan M. A. M. Janssens
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties Questionnaire ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document