Consequences of Piñon-Juniper Woodland Fuel Reduction: Prescribed Fire Increases Soil Erosion While Mastication Does Not

Ecosystems ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire C. Karban ◽  
Mark E. Miller ◽  
Jeffrey E. Herrick ◽  
Nichole N. Barger
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1139-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda D. Redmond ◽  
Tamara J. Zelikova ◽  
Nichole N. Barger

Fire ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Dukes ◽  
T. Adam Coates ◽  
Donald L. Hagan ◽  
W. Michael Aust ◽  
Thomas A. Waldrop ◽  
...  

From 2001–2018, a series of fuel reduction and ecosystem restoration treatments were implemented in the southern Appalachian Mountains near Asheville, North Carolina, USA. Treatments consisted of prescribed fire (four burns), mechanical cutting of understory shrubs and mid-story trees (two cuttings), and a combination of both cutting and prescribed fire (two cuts + four burns). Soils were sampled in 2018 to determine potential treatment impacts for O horizon and mineral soil (0–10 cm depth) carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) and mineral soil calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and pH. Results suggested that mean changes in O horizon C and N and mineral soil C, N, C:N, Ca, and P from 2001–2018 differed between the treatments, but only mineral soil C, N, C:N, and Ca displayed differences between at least one fuel reduction treatment and the untreated control. One soils-related restoration objective was mineral soil N reduction and the cut + burn treatment best achieved this result. Increased organic matter recalcitrance was another priority, but this was not obtained with any treatment. When paired with previously reported fuels and vegetation results from this site, it appeared that continued use of the cut + burn treatment may best achieve long-term management objectives for this site and other locations being managed for similar long-term restoration and fuels management objectives.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. McIver ◽  
Scott L. Stephens ◽  
James K. Agee ◽  
Jamie Barbour ◽  
Ralph E. J. Boerner ◽  
...  

The 12-site National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS) was a multivariate experiment that evaluated ecological consequences of alternative fuel-reduction treatments in seasonally dry forests of the US. Each site was a replicated experiment with a common design that compared an un-manipulated control, prescribed fire, mechanical and mechanical + fire treatments. Variables within the vegetation, fuelbed, forest floor and soil, bark beetles, tree diseases and wildlife were measured in 10-ha stands, and ecological response was compared among treatments at the site level, and across sites, to better understand the influence of differential site conditions. For most sites, treated stands were predicted to be more resilient to wildfire if it occurred shortly after treatment, but for most ecological variables, short-term response to treatments was subtle and transient. Strong site-specificity was observed in the response of most ecosystem variables, suggesting that practitioners employ adaptive management at the local scale. Because ecosystem components were tightly linked, adaptive management would need to include monitoring of a carefully chosen set of key variables. Mechanical treatments did not serve as surrogates for fire for most variables, suggesting that fire be maintained whenever possible. Restoration to pre-settlement conditions will require repeated treatments over time, with eastern forests requiring more frequent applications.


Geoderma ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 307 ◽  
pp. 172-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felícia Fonseca ◽  
Tomás de Figueiredo ◽  
Clotilde Nogueira ◽  
Anabela Queirós

CATENA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey A. Moffet ◽  
Frederick B. Pierson ◽  
Peter R. Robichaud ◽  
Kenneth E. Spaeth ◽  
Stuart P. Hardegree

Plant Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer B. Potts ◽  
Eva Marino ◽  
Scott L. Stephens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document