Endogenous regulation of night-time water relations in hybrid aspen grown at ambient and elevated air humidity

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2169-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gristin Rohula ◽  
Ingmar Tulva ◽  
Arvo Tullus ◽  
Anu Sõber ◽  
Priit Kupper
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2149-2157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priit Kupper ◽  
Gristin Rohula ◽  
Liina Inno ◽  
Ivika Ostonen ◽  
Arne Sellin ◽  
...  

Botany ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 709-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aigar Niglas ◽  
Meeli Alber ◽  
Kristi Suur ◽  
Anna K. Jasińska ◽  
Priit Kupper ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Liu ◽  
Qiu-Yuan Xu ◽  
Marjorie R. Lundgren ◽  
Qing Ye

The differing water relations between flowers and leaves on a plant reflect the lack of co-ordination between reproductive and vegetative organs during the evolution of angiosperm species. The amount of water that flowers consume has been reported to vary across species, and compared with studies of leaves, accurate measurements of flower water relations at the branch level are lacking. Further, the mechanisms by which flowers regulate their hydraulic function and structure to maintain water balance remain unclear. To explore the ecophysiological basis underpinning the differences between flowers and leaves, we measured hydraulic and morphological traits and monitored sap flow in flowers and leaves from the same branches of two Magnoliaceae species that flower before leaf emergence (Magnolia denudata Desr. and Magnolia soulangeana Soul.-Bod.). Sap flux density (JS) of flowers was 22% and 55% of that predicted for leaves in M. denudata and M. soulangeana respectively. JS of flowers commenced before predawn and ceased early in the afternoon, reflecting their night-time flowering pattern and a dramatic decrease of JS with increasing vapour pressure deficit (D) under the high light of midday. Relative to leaves, tepals were thicker and more hydrated, and had bigger but scarcer stomata, leading to lower stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (E), less negative water potential (Ψtepal) and lower hydraulic conductance. This study revealed different hydraulic patterns in the flowers and leaves of the two Magnolia species. Although flowers consumed less than half the water that leaves did, they used different strategies to maintain sufficiently high Ψ to sustain hydraulic safety. Magnolia flowers retained more hydrated tepals by exhibiting less water loss than leaves via lower hydraulic conductance. In contrast, Magnolia leaves maintained high transpiration rates through efficient stomatal responses to environmental changes compared with flowers.


Botany ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aigar Niglas ◽  
Meeli Alber ◽  
Kristi Suur ◽  
Anna K. Jasińska ◽  
Priit Kupper ◽  
...  

The study investigated the effects of exposure to increased relative air humidity (RH) on stomatal morphology and sensitivity to stomata closure inducing stimulus (low RH) in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) coppice growing in field conditions. Artificially elevated RH reduced air vapour pressure deficit by 5%–10% and altered stomatal sensitivity; trees grown under high RH exhibited stronger stomatal response to decreasing air humidity. We found no difference in mean stomatal pore length between treatments and a small decline in stomatal density under humidification. The lack of correlation between stomatal sensitivity and morphological traits suggests that stomatal sensitivity was unaffected by stomatal morphology. In light of rising atmospheric humidity predicted for high latitudes, strict stomatal control over water loss might be beneficial for trees if drought events become more frequent in the future. However, our experiment revealed that about two-thirds of the leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference (VPDL) response curves demonstrated the opposite pattern, i.e., stomatal opening in response to increasing VPDL. Strict stomatal regulation is probably not beneficial to fast-growing aspen coppice under low RH, as this trait may restrict their carbon gain and growth rate.


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Fanourakis ◽  
Susana M.P. Carvalho ◽  
Domingos P.F. Almeida ◽  
Olaf van Kooten ◽  
Wouter G. van Doorn ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 161 (10) ◽  
pp. 1133-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mª. Jesús Sánchez-Blanco ◽  
Trinitario Ferrández ◽  
Alejandra Navarro ◽  
Sebastián Bañon ◽  
Juan José Alarcón

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document