scholarly journals Correction to: Robotic surgery for thoracic surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Sandhaus ◽  
Marion Durand ◽  
Thorben Möller ◽  
Jan‑Hendrik Egberts ◽  
Matthias Steinert
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery

scholarly journals Robotic pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer treatment: program implementation and initial experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Mingarini Terra ◽  
Pedro Henrique Xavier Nabuco de Araujo ◽  
Leticia Leone Lauricella ◽  
José Ribas Milanez de Campos ◽  
Herbert Felix Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Pulmonary Lobectomy ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program at a public tertiary teaching hospital and to analyze its initial results. Methods: This was a planned interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in terms of the results obtained after pulmonary lobectomy. The robotic surgery program developed at the Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, is a multidisciplinary initiative involving various surgical specialties, as well as anesthesiology, nursing, and clinical engineering teams. In this analysis, we evaluated the patients included in the robotic lobectomy arm of the trial during its first three months (from April to June of 2015). Results: Ten patients were included in this analysis. There were eight women and two men. The mean age was 65.1 years. All of the patients presented with peripheral tumors. We performed right upper lobectomy in four patients, right lower lobectomy in four, and left upper lobectomy in two. Surgical time varied considerably (range, 135-435 min). Conversion to open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Intraoperative complications were not found. Only the first patient required postoperative transfer to the ICU. There were no deaths or readmissions within the first 30 days after discharge. The only postoperative complication was chest pain (grade 3), in two patients. Pathological examination revealed complete tumor resection in all cases. Conclusions: When there is integration and proper training of all of the teams involved, the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program is feasible and can reduce morbidity and mortality.

Navigating the Pathway to Robotic Competency in General Thoracic Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Seder ◽  
Stephen D. Cassivi ◽  
Dennis A. Wigle
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Robotic Skills ◽  
Competency Based

Objective Although robotic technology has addressed many of the limitations of traditional videoscopic surgery, robotic surgery has not gained widespread acceptance in the general thoracic community. We report our initial robotic surgery experience and propose a structured, competency-based pathway for the development of robotic skills. Methods Between December 2008 and February 2012, a total of 79 robot-assisted pulmonary, mediastinal, benign esophageal, or diaphragmatic procedures were performed. Data on patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were retrospectively collected and analyzed. During the study period, one surgeon and three residents participated in a triphasic, competency-based pathway designed to teach robotic skills. The pathway consisted of individual preclinical learning followed by mentored preclinical exercises and progressive clinical responsibility. Results The robot-assisted procedures performed included lung resection (n = 38), mediastinal mass resection (n = 19), hiatal or para-esophageal hernia repair (n = 12), and Heller myotomy (n = 7), among others (n = 3). There were no perioperative mortalities, with a 20% complication rate and a 3% readmission rate. Conversion to a thoracoscopic or open approach was required in eight pulmonary resections to facilitate dissection (six) or to control hemorrhage (two). Fewer major perioperative complications were observed in the later half of the experience. All residents who participated in the thoracic surgery robotic pathway perform robot-assisted procedures as part of their clinical practice. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracic surgery can be safely learned when skill acquisition is guided by a structured, competency-based pathway.

Nursing Cooperation for Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Gongxian Wang ◽  
Yu Zeng ◽  
Xia Sheng
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery

Comparison of the Early Robot-Assisted Lobectomy Experience to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer a Single-Institution Case Series Matching Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Jin Jang ◽  
Hyun-Sung Lee ◽  
Seong Yong Park ◽  
Jae Ill Zo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Vats Lobectomy ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Objective Robotic surgery has evolved in urology, gynecology, and general surgery and seems to be an oncologically sound surgical approach. Robotic surgery has been infrequently reported for pulmonary lobectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of our early experience in performing robot-assisted lobectomy (RAL) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Between February and October 2009, 40 patients underwent RAL for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. The dissection and anatomic isolation of the hilar structures were performed using two arms of the da Vinci S system. A retrospective comparison with two VATS groups was performed, our initial 40 VATS patients (between January 2006 and February 2007) and our most recent 40 VATS patients (between June 2008 and September 2009). The entire experience with VATS lobectomy is 163 cases. Results In the RAL group, the mean age was 64 years, and there were 23 male patients. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 29 patients with a mean tumor size of 3.5 cm. There were no conversions to open thoracotomy. Among the patients in our initial and recent VATS lobectomy groups, the conversion rate was 3 (8%) and 2 (5%) patients, respectively. The operative time for the RAL (240 ± 62 minutes) and the initial VATS lobectomy groups (257 ± 57 minutes) were similar but was longer than the recent VATS lobectomy group (161 ± 39 minutes, P < 0.001). However, the rate of postoperative complications in the RAL group (n = 4, 10%) was significantly lower than that of the initial VATS group (n = 13, 32.5%, P = 0.027) and similar to that of the recent VATS group (n = 7, 17.5%, P = 0.755). Intraoperative bleeding was reduced in the RAL group compared with the initial VATS group (219 mL vs 374 mL P = 0.017), and the median length of postoperative stay was significantly shorter for the RAL group compared with the initial VATS group (6 vs 9 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions The outcomes of our early RAL experience was comparable to the our outcomes achieved with VATS lobectomy, whether performed early or late.

scholarly journals Surgeon-Powered Robotics in Thoracic Surgery; An Era of Surgical Innovation and Its Benefits for the Patient and Beyond

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Trevis ◽  
Nicholas Chilvers ◽  
Kathrin Freystaetter ◽  
Joel Dunning
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Innovation ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
3D Camera ◽  
Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Following its introduction in 1992, the growth of minimally invasive thoracic surgery was initially hampered by the lack of specialized instruments, impeded visualization and stapling. However, in subsequent years these challenges were somewhat overcome and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) became the preferred modality of many centers. More recently, robotic surgery has come to the fore. Whilst it offers outstanding precision via robotic wristed instruments, robotic surgery is expensive and has safety implications as the surgeon is away from the patient's side. Wristed VATS instruments offer a new, exciting alternative. By placing the robotic-like wristed instruments in the hands of the surgeon, a concept we call surgeon-powered robotics, the benefits of robotic surgery can be achieved by the patient's side. We describe our experience of the ArtiSential® wristed instruments and discuss the benefits and challenges of this technology. By combining wristed instruments with the latest surgeon-controlled 3D camera technology, surgeon-powered robotics is an affordable reality.

Robotic Surgery in General Thoracic Surgery

2013 ◽  
pp. 121-143
Author(s):  
Hyun-Sung Lee ◽  
Hee-Jin Jang
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
General Thoracic Surgery

Robotic Thoracic Surgery Training for Residency Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wissam N. Raad ◽  
Adil Ayub ◽  
Chyun-Yin Huang ◽  
Landon Guntman ◽  
Sadiq S. Rehmani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Robotic Assisted Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery Training ◽  
Surgery Residency Program ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Objective Robotic-assisted surgery is increasingly being used in thoracic surgery. Currently, the Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency Program lacks a standardized curriculum or requirement for training residents in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. In most circumstances, because of the lack of formal residency training in robotic surgery, hospitals are requiring additional training, mentorship, and formal proctoring of cases before granting credentials to perform robotic-assisted surgery. Therefore, there is necessity for residents in Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency Program to have early exposure and formal training on the robotic platform. We propose a curriculum that can be incorporated into such programs that would satisfy both training needs and hospital credential requirements. Methods We surveyed all 26 Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency Program Directors in the United States. We also performed a PubMed literature search using the key word “robotic surgery training curriculum.” We reviewed various robotic surgery training curricula and evaluation tools used by urology, obstetrics gynecology, and general surgery training programs. We then designed a proposed curriculum geared toward thoracic Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency Program adopted from our credentialing experience, literature review, and survey consensus. Results Of the 26 programs surveyed, we received 17 responses. Most Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency Program directors believe that it is important to introduce robotic surgery training during residency. Our proposed curriculum is integrated during postgraduate years 2 to 6. In the preclinical stage postgraduate years 2 to 3, residents are required to complete introductory online modules, virtual reality simulator training, and in-house workshops. During clinical stage (postgraduate years 4–6), the resident will serve as a supervised bedside assistant and progress to a console surgeon. Each case will have defined steps that the resident must demonstrate competency. Evaluation will be based on standardized guidelines. Conclusions Expansion and utilization of robotic assistance in thoracic surgery have increased. Our proposed curriculum aims to enable Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency Program residents to achieve competency in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and to facilitate the acquirement of hospital privileges when they enter practice.

Optimal Allocation of Robotic Surgery Resources in Thoracic Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e164
Author(s):  
Toby P. Keeney-Bonthrone ◽  
Kenneth L. Abbott ◽  
Armani M. Hawes ◽  
Andrew C. Chang ◽  
Jules Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Optimal Allocation

scholarly journals Analysis of initial results of robotic surgery for general thoracic surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 704-712
Author(s):  
Hiroshige Nakamura ◽  
Yuji Taniguchi ◽  
Kunio Araki ◽  
Ken Miwa ◽  
Shinji Fujioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
General Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Initial Results

Commentary: Robotic Techniques in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery (Innovations, May/June 2020)

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-424
Author(s):  
Eugene A. Grossi ◽  
Stacey Chen ◽  
Didier F. Loulmet
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Salient Points ◽  
Robotic Cardiac Surgery ◽  
High Level ◽  
Robotic Surgical System ◽  
Surgical System

This is a response to the papers in the May/June issue of Innovations focused on robotic techniques in cardiac and thoracic surgery. Successful robotic surgery relies on a high level of preparation and communication from each member of the operating room. The lack of a team approach can result in not only failure to establish and/or sustain a robotic program, but more importantly, in serious consequences at the detriment to patient care and safety. While these are salient points, the authors of this commentary wish to highlight that the first robot-assisted mitral valve surgery in North America was performed at NYU Langone Health using the Zeus robotic surgical system. Although that robotic platform had several disadvantages that limited its clinical advancement, an appreciation for this history in robotic cardiac surgery is important if we as cardiothoracic surgeons seek to move toward a future of expanding robotic surgery within the ever-changing landscape of cardiac surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document